Rapid assessment of ecosystem services provided by two mineral extraction sites restored for nature conservation in an agricultural landscape in eastern England.
Rapid assessment of ecosystem services provided by two mineral extraction sites restored for nature conservation in an agricultural landscape in eastern England.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1371/journal.pone.0121010
复制
发表时间：
2015
期刊：
影响因子：
3.7
通讯作者：
Bradbury RB
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Blaen PJ;Jia L;Peh KS;Field RH;Balmford A;MacDonald MA;Bradbury RB
尽管人们越来越认识到，为自然保护而恢复的矿址可以增强当地的生物多样性，但人们对这种恢复相对于其他选择所提供的更广泛的社会效益还没有很好的了解。本研究通过量化两种常见的矿产地后利用（自然保护和农业）下生态系统服务提供的差异来解决这一研究空白。结合使用特定地点的主要领域的数据，利益转移和建模，我们表明，我们的网站恢复自然保护提供了更多样化的生态系统服务，比将在农业恢复的情况下提供。我们还探讨了解决不同的保护目标，我们发现改变提供生态系统服务的服务的基础上的影响。高度以物种为重点的干预区与增加碳储存和牲畜放牧有关，而非干预区对碳固存、捕鱼、娱乐和减轻洪水风险很重要。这项研究的结果突出了恢复的矿址更广泛的社会重要性，并可能有助于保护管理人员和规划人员制定未来的恢复战略，为生物多样性和人类福祉提供好处。
Despite growing recognition that mineral sites restored for nature conservation can enhance local biodiversity, the wider societal benefits provided by this type of restoration relative to alternative options are not well understood. This study addresses this research gap by quantifying differences in ecosystem services provision under two common mineral site after-uses: nature conservation and agriculture. Using a combination of site-specific primary field data, benefits transfer and modelling, we show that for our sites restoration for nature conservation provides a more diverse array of ecosystem services than would be delivered under an agricultural restoration scenario. We also explore the effects of addressing different conservation targets, which we find alter the provision of ecosystem services on a service-specific basis. Highly species-focused intervention areas are associated with increased carbon storage and livestock grazing provision, whereas non-intervention areas are important for carbon sequestration, fishing, recreation and flood risk mitigation. The results of this study highlight the wider societal importance of restored mineral sites and may help conservation managers and planners to develop future restoration strategies that provide benefits for both biodiversity and human well-being.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
5.9
作者：
Bateman, Ian J.;Mace, Georgina M.;Turner, Kerry
通讯作者：
Turner, Kerry
影响因子：
3.4
作者：
Fisher, Brendan;Bradbury, Richard B.;Gill, Jennifer A.
通讯作者：
Gill, Jennifer A.
影响因子：
6.3
作者：
Benes, J;Kepka, P;Konvicka, M
通讯作者：
Konvicka, M
DOI：
10.1073/pnas.1003369107
发表时间：
2010-12-14
影响因子：
11.1
作者：
Birch, Jennifer C.;Newton, Adrian C.;Garavito, Natalia Tejedor
通讯作者：
Garavito, Natalia Tejedor
影响因子：
6.6
作者：
Allard, V.;Soussana, J-F.;Pinares-Patino, C.
通讯作者：
Pinares-Patino, C.