The Park is Ruining our Livelihoods. We Support the Park! Unravelling the Paradox of Attitudes to Protected Areas.
The Park is Ruining our Livelihoods. We Support the Park! Unravelling the Paradox of Attitudes to Protected Areas.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1007/s10745-017-9941-2
复制
发表时间：
2018
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Dawson NM
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Martin A;Myers R;Dawson NM
尽管有相当多的实地创新和学术审查，但保护方法、当地对公园的支持和公园效率之间的联系仍然令人费解。理解环境正义概念的常见方法是理解分配和程序问题，决策中的代表性，以及对权威和主张的承认。我们采取了不同的方法，从制度、观念和心理的角度分析了环境正义的主张。我们试图了解国家公园是如何得到当地社区的广泛支持的，尽管他们承认这严重影响了他们的生计。我们在南富路易国家保护区附近的三个村庄进行了100户家庭访谈。我们的研究发现，村民们1)在没有完全改变森林利用行为的情况下，坚持国家对农业活动和其他收入的破碎承诺；2)受到国家“教育”计划的严重影响；3)接受国家权威，缺乏基于历史经验和价值观的决策参与；通过过分强调公园的积极方面来证明他们的负担是合理的。我们的研究结果提供了一个补充框架来解释环境正义主张，允许对人们如何应对正义和不公正进行细致入微的分析，特别是如何通过经过验证的社会科学概念来识别不公正。
Despite considerable field-based innovation and academic scrutiny, the nexus between conservation approaches, local support for parks and park effectiveness remains quite puzzling. Common approaches to understanding notions of environmental justice are to understand distributional and procedural issues, representation in decision making, and recognition of authorities and claims. We took a different approach and analysed environmental justice claims through institutional, ideational and psychological lenses. We sought to understand how the national park could have such broad support from local communities despite their acknowledgement that it severely curtailed their livelihoods. We conducted 100 household interviews in three villages that border Nam Et-Phou Louey National Protected Area. Our study found that villagers 1) hold on to broken promises by the State for agricultural activities and alternative revenues without fully changing forest use behaviours; 2) were influenced heavily by the ‘educational’ programmes by the State; 3) accepted the authority of the State and lack of participation in decision-making based on historical experiences and values; 4) justified their burdens by over-emphasising the positive aspects of the park. Our findings present a complementary framework to explain environmental justice claims, allowing for a nuanced analysis of how people respond to justices and injustices, and specifically how injustices can be identified through proven social science concepts.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
7.2
作者：
Fiske, ST
通讯作者：
Fiske, ST
影响因子：
4.2
作者：
Carstensen, Martin B.;Schmidt, Vivien A.
通讯作者：
Schmidt, Vivien A.
影响因子：
1.9
作者：
Daigneault, Pierre-Marc;Beland, Daniel
通讯作者：
Beland, Daniel
影响因子：
6.3
作者：
Baker, Julia;Milner-Gulland, E. J.;Leader-Williams, Nigel
通讯作者：
Leader-Williams, Nigel
影响因子：
3
作者：
Evrard, O;Goudineau, Y
通讯作者：
Goudineau, Y