What does the articulatory output buffer know about alternative picture names? Evidence against the response-exclusion hypothesis
What does the articulatory output buffer know about alternative picture names? Evidence against the response-exclusion hypothesis
复制标题
发音输出缓冲区对替代图片名称了解多少？
DOI：
10.1080/01690965.2011.595725
复制
发表时间：
--
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Mädebach
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Hantsch;Mädebach
当被试在干扰词存在的情况下命名图片时，干扰词和图片名称之间的语义关系会干扰命名反应。一些模型认为这反映了词汇竞争过程，而另一些模型则认为这是词汇后反应排除机制的结果。根据后一种观点，干扰词有特权访问发音输出缓冲区，必须在产生图片名称之前从缓冲区中清除。该缓冲区被假定为能够访问与给定任务相关的信息，例如总语义类别信息。图片名称和干扰词之间的任何（语义）相似性都会使去除干扰词变得更加困难，从而延长命名时间。然而，更细粒度的语义信息是不可访问的发音输出缓冲区，因此，不应该影响命名性能。我们测试了这一假设，通过比较两个语义干扰条件的影响保持干扰词和要产生的（基本级别）图片名称之间的语义关系不变，而只操纵干扰词和图片的从属级别名称之间的关系。与反应排除假说的预测相反，这种操作决定了是否获得语义干扰。
When participants name pictures in the presence of a distractor word, a semantic relation between distractor word and picture name interferes with the naming response. Some models take this to reflect a lexical-competition process, while other models assume it to result from a postlexical response-exclusion mechanism. According to the latter view, the distractor word has privileged access to an articulatory output buffer and has to be purged from it before the picture name can be produced. This buffer is assumed to have access to information that is relevant within a given task such as gross semantic category information. Any (semantic) similarity between the picture name and the distractor word then should render removal of the distractor more difficult and thus prolong naming latencies. However, more fine-grained semantic information is not accessible to the articulatory output buffer and, thus, should not affect naming performance. We tested this assumption by comparing the effect of two semantic distractor conditions keeping the semantic relation between distractor words and the to-be-produced (basic-level) picture names constant, while manipulating only the relation between the distractor and the pictures' subordinate-level name. Contrary to the predictions of the response-exclusion hypothesis, this manipulation determined whether or not semantic interference was obtained.
登录
查看更多内容
词汇选择不是一个竞争过程：对 La Heij 等人的答复
影响因子：
3.6
作者：
Matthew Finkbeiner;A. Caramazza
通讯作者：
A. Caramazza
无人看管的印刷文字造成的语义干扰
DOI：
--
发表时间：
1976
期刊：
影响因子：
--
作者：
G. Underwood
通讯作者：
G. Underwood
DOI：
10.1037/0278-7393.33.3.503
发表时间：
2007-05-01
影响因子：
2.6
作者：
Mahon, Bradford Z.;Costa, Albert;Caramazza, Alfonso
通讯作者：
Caramazza, Alfonso
影响因子：
4.1
作者：
Miozzo, M;Caramazza, A
通讯作者：
Caramazza, A
DOI：
10.1037/a0017020
发表时间：
2009-11-01
影响因子：
2.6
作者：
Hantsch, Ansgar;Jescheniak, Joerg D.;Schriefers, Herbert
通讯作者：
Schriefers, Herbert