High-resolution magnetic resonance elastography reveals differences in subcortical gray matter viscoelasticity between young and healthy older adults.
High-resolution magnetic resonance elastography reveals differences in subcortical gray matter viscoelasticity between young and healthy older adults.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2018.01.010
复制
发表时间:
2018-05
影响因子:
4.2
通讯作者:
Starr JM
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Hiscox LV;Johnson CL;McGarry MDJ;Perrins M;Littlejohn A;van Beek EJR;Roberts N;Starr JM
Volumetric structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is commonly used to determine the extent of neuronal loss in aging, indicated by cerebral atrophy. The brain, however, exhibits other biophysical characteristics such as mechanical properties, which can be quantified with magnetic resonance elastography (MRE). MRE is an emerging noninvasive imaging technique for measuring viscoelastic tissue properties, proven to be sensitive metrics of neural tissue integrity, as described by shear stiffness, μ and damping ratio, ξ parameters. The study objective was to evaluate global and regional MRE parameter differences between young (19–30 years, n = 12) and healthy older adults (66–73 years, n = 12) and to assess whether MRE measures provide additive value over volumetric magnetic resonance imaging measurements. We investigated the viscoelasticity of the global cerebrum and 6 regions of interest (ROIs) including the amygdala, hippocampus, caudate, pallidum, putamen, and thalamus. In older adults, we found a decrease in μ in all ROIs, except for the hippocampus, indicating widespread brain softening; an effect that remained significant after controlling for ROI volume. In contrast, the relative viscous-to-elastic behavior of the brain ξ did not differ between age groups, suggesting a preservation of the organization of the tissue microstructure. These data support the use of MRE as a novel imaging biomarker for characterizing age-related differences to neural tissue not captured by volumetric imaging alone.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
3.7
作者:
Klein C;Hain EG;Braun J;Riek K;Mueller S;Steiner B;Sack I
通讯作者:
Sack I
影响因子:
4.2
作者:
Callaghan MF;Freund P;Draganski B;Anderson E;Cappelletti M;Chowdhury R;Diedrichsen J;Fitzgerald TH;Smittenaar P;Helms G;Lutti A;Weiskopf N
通讯作者:
Weiskopf N
影响因子:
3.3
作者:
Johnson, Curtis L.;Holtrop, Joseph L.;McGarry, Matthew D. J.;Weaver, John B.;Paulsen, Keith D.;Georgiadis, John G.;Sutton, Bradley P.
通讯作者:
Sutton, Bradley P.
影响因子:
3.5
作者:
McGarry MD;Van Houten EE;Perriñez PR;Pattison AJ;Weaver JB;Paulsen KD
通讯作者:
Paulsen KD
影响因子:
3.7
作者:
Guo J;Hirsch S;Fehlner A;Papazoglou S;Scheel M;Braun J;Sack I
通讯作者:
Sack I