People infer communicative action through an expectation for efficient communication.

People infer communicative action through an expectation for efficient communication.
复制标题

DOI:
10.1038/s41467-022-31716-3
复制
发表时间:
2022-07-18
影响因子:
16.6
通讯作者:
--
中科院分区:
综合性期刊1区
文献类型:
--
作者:

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

人类经常通过眨眼、挥手和眨眼等身体动作进行交流。然而,目前还不清楚我们如何识别某人的身体动作是交流的。鉴于人们倾向于将彼此的行为解释为旨在改变世界,我们假设人们期望沟通行动有效地揭示他们缺乏外部目标。使用目标推理的计算模型,我们预测,当对世界采取行动时不太可能产生的动作,特别是重复的动作,应该被视为是交流的。我们发现支持我们的帐户在各种范式,包括分级的可接受性任务,被迫选择的任务,间接提示,和开放式的解释任务,在市场一体化和非市场一体化的社区。我们的工作表明,对交际行为的认识是建立在一个推理过程的基础上的,这个过程源于不同形式的行为解释所共享的基本计算。人类可以迅速推断出某人的身体动作是为了交流。在这里,作者表明,这种能力的基础是期望沟通行动将有效地揭示他们缺乏外部目标。
Humans often communicate using body movements like winks, waves, and nods. However, it is unclear how we identify when someone’s physical actions are communicative. Given people’s propensity to interpret each other’s behavior as aimed to produce changes in the world, we hypothesize that people expect communicative actions to efficiently reveal that they lack an external goal. Using computational models of goal inference, we predict that movements that are unlikely to be produced when acting towards the world and, in particular, repetitive ought to be seen as communicative. We find support for our account across a variety of paradigms, including graded acceptability tasks, forced-choice tasks, indirect prompts, and open-ended explanation tasks, in both market-integrated and non-market-integrated communities. Our work shows that the recognition of communicative action is grounded in an inferential process that stems from fundamental computations shared across different forms of action interpretation. Humans can quickly infer when someone’s body movements are meant to be communicative. Here, the authors show that this capacity is underpinned by an expectation that communicative actions will efficiently reveal that they lack an external goal.
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0162246
发表时间: 2016
期刊: PloS one
影响因子: 3.7
作者:
Gershman SJ;Gerstenberg T;Baker CL;Cushman FA
通讯作者: Cushman FA
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1619666114
发表时间: 2017-10-03
影响因子: 11.1
作者:
Gibson, Edward;Futrell, Richard;Conway, Bevil R.
通讯作者: Conway, Bevil R.
DOI: 10.1111/1467-7687.00211
发表时间: 2002-03-01
影响因子: 3.7
作者:
Brand, RJ;Baldwin, DA;Ashburn, LA
通讯作者: Ashburn, LA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.07.005
发表时间: 2009-12-01
期刊: COGNITION
影响因子: 3.4
作者:
Baker, Chris L.;Saxe, Rebecca;Tenenbaum, Joshua B.
通讯作者: Tenenbaum, Joshua B.
DOI: 10.1207/s15516709cog2701_4
发表时间: 2003-01-01
期刊: COGNITIVE SCIENCE
影响因子: 2.5
作者:
Csibra, G;Bíró, S;Gergely, G
通讯作者: Gergely, G