Comparing impacts of meditation training in focused attention, open monitoring, and mindfulness-based cognitive therapy on emotion reactivity and regulation: Neural and subjective evidence from a dismantling study.
Comparing impacts of meditation training in focused attention, open monitoring, and mindfulness-based cognitive therapy on emotion reactivity and regulation: Neural and subjective evidence from a dismantling study.
复制标题
比较冥想训练对集中注意力、开放监控和基于正念的认知疗法对情绪反应和调节的影响：来自拆解研究的神经和主观证据。
DOI：
10.1111/psyp.14024
复制
发表时间：
2022-07
期刊：
影响因子：
3.7
通讯作者：
Britton, Willoughby B.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Brown, Kirk Warren;Berry, Daniel;Eichel, Kristina;Beloborodova, Polina;Rahrig, Hadley;Britton, Willoughby B.
常见的正念训练，如正念减压（MBSR）和正念认知疗法（MBCT），强调了两种主要形式的冥想训练：集中注意力（FA）和开放式监控（OM）。目前还不清楚这些正念练习中的每一种对情绪和其他重要训练结果的贡献。这项拆除试验比较了MBCT，FA和OM中结构等效训练对社区成年人情绪反应和调节的神经和主观标记的影响，旨在更好地了解哪些形式的训练代表正念训练中的活性成分。有不同程度抑郁症状的参与者被随机分配到三种训练中的一种。在每8周的训练前后，N = 89名参与者完成了情绪反应和调节任务的修改版本，同时收集了脑电图（EEG）和自我报告的对消极，积极和中性照片的情绪反应。在任务的被动观察（反应）和主动调节阶段，对基于EEG的额叶α带不对称性的检查表明，FA和MBCT训练在额叶α不对称性方面产生了显著的半球性变化，通常与向基于方法的积极情感的转变有关。自我报告的对负面图像的情绪反应证实了这些结果，表明情绪反应和调节都发生了有益的变化。OM训练的有益效果有限，仅限于主观结果。研究结果表明，MBCT可能会从FA而不是OM的培训中获得最大的好处。讨论强调了FA训练对情绪健康的潜在价值。在第一份报告中，我们比较了集中注意力冥想（FA）、开放意识冥想（OM）和基于正念的认知疗法（MBCT）对抑郁症状患者的情绪相关影响，我们发现，在情绪反应和调节任务中，FA和MBCT在额叶α不对称性方面产生了半球性变化，与基于方法的积极影响一致。自我报告的负面图像的情绪反应证实了这些结果。研究结果强调了FA和MBCT培训对情绪健康的潜在价值。
Commonly conducted mindfulness‐based trainings such as Mindfulness‐based Stress Reduction (MBSR) and Mindfulness‐based Cognitive Therapy (MBCT) highlight training in two key forms of meditation: focused attention (FA) and open monitoring (OM). Largely unknown is what each of these mindfulness practices contributes to emotional and other important training outcomes. This dismantling trial compared the effects of structurally equivalent trainings in MBCT, FA, and OM on neural and subjective markers of emotional reactivity and regulation among community adults, with the aim to better understand which forms of training represent active ingredients in mindfulness trainings. Participants with varying levels of depressive symptoms were randomized to one of the three trainings. Before and after each 8‐week training, N = 89 participants completed a modified version of the Emotional Reactivity and Regulation Task while electroencephalographic (EEG) and self‐reported emotional responses to negative, positive, and neutral photographic images were collected. Examination of EEG‐based frontal alpha band asymmetry during passive viewing (reactivity) and active regulation phases of the task showed that FA and MBCT trainings produced significant leftward hemispheric shifts in frontal alpha asymmetry, commonly associated with a shift toward approach‐based positive affect. Self‐reported emotional responses to negative images corroborated these results, suggesting salutary changes in both emotional reactivity and regulation. OM training had limited beneficial effects, restricted to the subjective outcomes. The findings suggest that MBCT may derive its greatest benefit from training in FA rather than OM. Discussion highlights the potential value of FA training for emotional health. In the first report comparing emotion‐relevant impacts of focused attention meditation (FA), open awareness meditation (OM), and Mindfulness‐based Cognitive Therapy (MBCT) among those with depressive symptoms, we show that FA and MBCT produced leftward hemispheric shifts in frontal alpha asymmetry, consistent with approach‐based positive affect, during an emotion reactivity and regulation task. Self‐reported emotional responses to negative images corroborated these results. The findings highlight the potential value of FA and MBCT training for emotional health.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
4.1
作者：
Britton WB;Davis JH;Loucks EB;Peterson B;Cullen BH;Reuter L;Rando A;Rahrig H;Lipsky J;Lindahl JR
通讯作者：
Lindahl JR
DOI：
10.1523/jneurosci.2957-12.2012
发表时间：
2012-10-31
期刊：
The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience
影响因子：
--
作者：
Allen M;Dietz M;Blair KS;van Beek M;Rees G;Vestergaard-Poulsen P;Lutz A;Roepstorff A
通讯作者：
Roepstorff A
影响因子：
3.6
作者：
Analayo, Bhikkhu
通讯作者：
Analayo, Bhikkhu
影响因子：
4.1
作者：
Arch, Joanna J.;Craske, Michelle G.
通讯作者：
Craske, Michelle G.
影响因子：
2.6
作者：
Coan, JA;Allen, JJB;McKnight, PE
通讯作者：
McKnight, PE