Effect of different thermal stimuli on improving microcirculation in the contralateral foot.
Effect of different thermal stimuli on improving microcirculation in the contralateral foot.
复制标题
不同热刺激对改善对侧足部微循环的影响
DOI：
10.1186/s12938-021-00849-9
复制
发表时间：
2021-02-02
影响因子：
3.9
通讯作者：
Fan Y
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Ren W;Xu L;Zheng X;Pu F;Li D;Fan Y
研究背景人体的下肢经常受到微循环障碍的影响，特别是在老年人或患有糖尿病等基础疾病的人中。特别是对于患有外周血管疾病、皮肤病变或一侧肢体佩戴外固定器的人，直接接触治疗不适合他们改善微循环。据报道，加热对侧肢体可以改善受损肢体的血流。然而，其对足底微血管反应的影响尚未被研究。因此，本研究的目的是探讨如何加热温水浴和红外线辐射影响对侧脚的循环。12名健康成年人参加了这项研究，并被随机分配到将左脚放在温水浴中或将其暴露于红外辐射中，每隔一天进行10分钟的干预。测量干预前后对侧足第二跖骨头皮肤温度（Temp）和皮肤血流量（SBF）。（水浴：29.05 ± 3.56 °C至31.03 ± 4.14 °C;红外：29.98 ± 3.86 °C至31.07 ± 3.92 °C）和SBF（浴：从62.26 ± 48.12 PU到97.76 ± 63.90 PU;红外：从63.37 ± 39.88 PU到85.27 ± 47.62 PU）在两个测试中加热后显著增加（p< 0.05）。结论两种加热方法均能有效地提高对侧体温和SBF，但温浴法有较强的余热效应。
BackgroundThe lower extremities of the body often suffer from impaired microcirculation, particularly in the elderly or people with underlying conditions such as diabetes. Especially for people suffering from peripheral vascular diseases, skin lesions or wearing an external fixator in one side of limbs, direct contact treatments are not suitable for them to improve microcirculation. Heating the contralateral limb has been reported to improve blood flow in the impaired limb. However, its effect on plantar microvascular responses has not been previously investigated. Thus, the aim of this study was to explore how heating by warm bath and infrared radiation affects the circulations in the contralateral foot. Twelve healthy adults participated in this study and were randomly assigned to either placing the left foot in a warm bath or exposing it to infrared radiation for 10 min intervention every other day. The skin temperature (Temp) and skin blood flow (SBF) in the second metatarsal head of the contralateral foot were measured before and after the intervention.ResultsThe results showed that both Temp (Bath: from 29.05 ± 3.56 °C to 31.03 ± 4.14 °C; Infrared: from 29.98 ± 3.86 °C to 31.07 ± 3.92 °C) and SBF (Bath: from 62.26 ± 48.12 PU to 97.76 ± 63.90 PU; Infrared: from 63.37 ± 39.88 PU to 85.27 ± 47.62 PU) in the contralateral foot were significantly increased after heating in both tests (p< 0.05). However, the contralateral SBF increased for 5 min after heating in warm bath test, but only for 1 min in infrared radiation test.ConclusionsThe results of this study show that both heating methods are the effective at increasing contralateral Temp and SBF, but the warm bath has a stronger residual thermal effect.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
--
作者：
ASTRUP, A;SIMONSEN, L;CHRISTENSEN, NJ
通讯作者：
CHRISTENSEN, NJ
影响因子：
5.3
作者：
Haak, E;Abletshauser, C;Haak, T
通讯作者：
Haak, T
DOI：
10.1152/ajpheart.00519.2016
发表时间：
2017-01-01
影响因子：
4.8
作者：
Romero, Steven A.;Gagnon, Daniel;Crandall, Craig G.
通讯作者：
Crandall, Craig G.
影响因子：
--
作者：
KANOSUE, K;NIWA, K;MATSUMURA, K
通讯作者：
MATSUMURA, K
不同间歇时间的局部振动对糖尿病患者皮肤血流反应的影响
影响因子：
5.7
作者：
Ren, Weiyan;Pu, Fang;Jan, Yih-Kuen
通讯作者：
Jan, Yih-Kuen