Environmental perceptions and objective walking trail audits inform a community-based participatory research walking intervention.
Environmental perceptions and objective walking trail audits inform a community-based participatory research walking intervention.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1186/1479-5868-9-6
复制
发表时间：
2012-01-30
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Yadrick K
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Zoellner J;Hill JL;Zynda K;Sample AD;Yadrick K
鉴于记录在案的低收入少数族裔社区中存在的身体活动差异，以及越来越多地关注解决身体活动不足问题的社会生态方法，需要努力了解支持身体活动的建筑环境。这个基于社区的参与性研究 (CBPR) 项目调查了南部少数民族社区对步行道的看法，并客观地审查了步行道。主要目的是探索感知和客观审计变量是否可以预测步行和身体活动、MET/分钟/周身体活动以及步道使用频率的会议建议。在这项横断面研究中，采用比例抽样计划对社区居民进行调查。先前验证的仪器经过试点测试并进行了适当调整，包括经过验证的国际体育活动问卷的简短版本、步道使用和步行道的看法。使用有效且可靠的路径环境审核工具对步行道进行评估，该工具评估四个内容领域，包括：设计特色、便利设施、维护和行人交通安全。分析包括卡方、单向方差分析、多元线性回归和多重逻辑模型。有许多（n = 21）高质量的步行道可供使用。在所有小径上，几乎没有什么不文明行为的迹象，并且安全功能评价相对较高。在 372 名受访者中，步道使用显着预测了步行和身体活动以及 MET/分钟/周的会议建议。在控制其他变量的同时，步道使用的重要预测因素包括与步道的接近程度，以及对步行道安全、步道设施和附近行人安全的看法。此外，在控制教育、性别和收入的同时；每周使用步行道的次数每增加一次，满足步行建议的几率就会增加 1.27 倍，满足 PA 建议的几率就会增加 3.54 倍。感知和客观的审计变量并不能预测是否满足身体活动建议。为了提高身体活动水平，需要采取干预措施，最大限度地利用现有步道，并改善居民对步道不文明、安全、步道条件和便利设施的看法。这项研究为 CBPR 步行干预的发展以及该南部社区的当地娱乐和环境政策提供了重要的见解。
Given the documented physical activity disparities that exist among low-income minority communities and the increased focused on socio-ecological approaches to address physical inactivity, efforts aimed at understanding the built environment to support physical activity are needed. This community-based participatory research (CBPR) project investigates walking trails perceptions in a high minority southern community and objectively examines walking trails. The primary aim is to explore if perceived and objective audit variables predict meeting recommendations for walking and physical activity, MET/minutes/week of physical activity, and frequency of trail use. A proportional sampling plan was used to survey community residents in this cross-sectional study. Previously validated instruments were pilot tested and appropriately adapted and included the short version of the validated International Physical Activity Questionnaire, trail use, and perceptions of walking trails. Walking trails were assessed using the valid and reliable Path Environmental Audit Tool which assesses four content areas including: design features, amenities, maintenance, and pedestrian safety from traffic. Analyses included Chi-square, one-way ANOVA's, multiple linear regression, and multiple logistic models. Numerous (n = 21) high quality walking trails were available. Across trails, there were very few indicators of incivilities and safety features rated relatively high. Among the 372 respondents, trail use significantly predicted meeting recommendations for walking and physical activity, and MET/minutes/week. While controlling for other variables, significant predictors of trail use included proximity to trails, as well as perceptions of walking trail safety, trail amenities, and neighborhood pedestrian safety. Furthermore, while controlling for education, gender, and income; for every one time per week increase in using walking trails, the odds for meeting walking recommendations increased 1.27 times, and the odds for meeting PA recommendation increased 3.54 times. Perceived and objective audit variables did not predict meeting physical activity recommendations. To improve physical activity levels, intervention efforts are needed to maximize the use of existing trails, as well as improve residents' perceptions related to incivilities, safety, conditions of trail, and amenities of the walking trails. This study provides important insights for informing development of the CBPR walking intervention and informing local recreational and environmental policies in this southern community.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
3.8
作者：
Estabrooks, PA;Lee, RE;Gyurcsik, NC
通讯作者：
Gyurcsik, NC
DOI：
10.1249/01.mss.0000084622.39122.0c
发表时间：
2003-09-01
期刊：
MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE
影响因子：
--
作者：
Eyler, AA;Brownson, RC;Housemann, RA
通讯作者：
Housemann, RA
影响因子：
5.5
作者：
Brownson, Ross C.;Hoehner, Christine M.;Day, Kristen;Forsyth, Ann;Sallis, James F.
通讯作者：
Sallis, James F.
影响因子：
5.5
作者：
Abercrombie, Lauren C.;Sallis, James F.;Chapman, James E.
通讯作者：
Chapman, James E.
影响因子：
8
作者：
Gordon-Larsen, P;Nelson, MC;Popkin, BM
通讯作者：
Popkin, BM