Hippocampal-sparing whole-brain radiotherapy: a "how-to" technique using helical tomotherapy and linear accelerator-based intensity-modulated radiotherapy.

Hippocampal-sparing whole-brain radiotherapy: a "how-to" technique using helical tomotherapy and linear accelerator-based intensity-modulated radiotherapy.
复制标题

DOI:
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.01.039
复制
发表时间:
2010-11-15
影响因子:
7
通讯作者:
Tome, Wolfgang A.
Tome, Wolfgang A.
中科院分区:
医学1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Gondi, Vinai;Tolakanahalli, Ranjini;Mehta, Minesh P.;Tewatia, Dinesh;Rowley, Howard;Kuo, John S.;Khuntia, Deepak;Tome, Wolfgang A.

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

在颅脑照射期间保护海马体,在轮廓和治疗计划方面提出了重要的技术挑战。在这里,我们报告了我们的初步经验,全脑放射治疗的患者使用海马区保留。对5例既往接受全脑放疗保留海马区的匿名病例进行回顾分析。海马体被画出轮廓,并使用围绕海马体的5 mm体积扩张来创建海马体回避区域。螺旋断层放射治疗和基于直线加速器的调强放射治疗计划被生成,处方剂量为30Gy10次。平均海马区回避体积为3.3cm3,占全脑计划靶体积的2.1%。螺旋断层放射治疗免除了海马区的照射,平均剂量为5.5GY,最大剂量为12.8GY。基于直线加速器的调强放射治疗免除了海马区的照射,中位剂量为7.8Gy.最大剂量为15.3Gy.在每个部分的基础上,使用螺旋断层放射治疗的海马区的平均剂量(归一化为2-Gy2次)减少了87%至0.49Gy2,使用基于直线加速器的调强放射治疗减少了81%至0.73Gy2。两种调强放射治疗方式的靶区覆盖率和均质性均可接受,差异主要归因于螺旋断层放射治疗的剂量下降更快。现代调强放射治疗技术允许保留海马体,具有可接受的靶区覆盖率和同质性。基于令人信服的临床前证据,第二阶段合作小组试验已经开发出来,以测试假定的神经认知益处。
Sparing the hippocampus during cranial irradiation poses important technical challenges with respect to contouring and treatment planning. Herein, we report our preliminary experience with whole-brain radiotherapy using hippocampal sparing for patients with brain metastases. 5 anonymous patients previously treated with whole-brain radiotherapy with hippocampal sparing were reviewed. The hippocampus was contoured, and hippocampal avoidance regions were created using a 5mm volumetric expansion around the hippocampus. Helical tomotherapy and LINAC-based IMRT treatment plans were generated for a prescription dose of 30 Gy in 10 fractions. On average, the hippocampal avoidance volume was 3.3 cm3, occupying 2.1% of the whole brain planned target volume. Helical tomotherapy spared the hippocampus, with a median dose of 5.5 Gy and maximum dose of 12.8 Gy. LINAC-based IMRT spared the hippocampus, with a median dose of 7.8 Gy and maximum dose of 15.3 Gy. On a per-fraction basis, mean dose to the hippocampus (normalized to 2-Gy fractions) was reduced by 87% to 0.49 Gy2 using helical tomotherapy and by 81% to 0.73 Gy2 using LINAC-based IMRT. Target coverage and homogeneity was acceptable with both IMRT modalities, with differences largely attributed to more rapid dose fall-off with helical tomotherapy. Modern IMRT techniques allow for sparing of the hippocampus with acceptable target coverage and homogeneity. Based on compelling preclinical evidence, a phase II cooperative group trial has been developed to test the postulated neurocognitive benefit.
DOI: 10.1038/3305
发表时间: 1998-11-01
期刊: NATURE MEDICINE
影响因子: 82.9
作者:
Eriksson, PS;Perfilieva, E;Gage, FH
通讯作者: Gage, FH
DOI: 10.1016/s0090-3019(00)00214-7
发表时间: 2000-05-01
期刊: SURGICAL NEUROLOGY
影响因子: --
作者:
Nagai, R;Tsunoda, S;Asada, H
通讯作者: Asada, H
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2005.04.011
发表时间: 2005-08-01
影响因子: 7
作者:
Van Vulpen, M;Field, C;Fallone, BG
通讯作者: Fallone, BG
DOI: 10.1016/0006-8993(87)90717-7
发表时间: 1987-04-21
期刊: BRAIN RESEARCH
影响因子: 2.9
作者:
COLLIER, TJ;QUIRK, GJ;ROUTTENBERG, A
通讯作者: ROUTTENBERG, A
DOI: 10.1038/386493a0
发表时间: 1997-04-03
期刊: NATURE
影响因子: 64.8
作者:
Kempermann, G;Kuhn, HG;Gage, FH
通讯作者: Gage, FH