Hippocampal-sparing whole-brain radiotherapy: a "how-to" technique using helical tomotherapy and linear accelerator-based intensity-modulated radiotherapy.
Hippocampal-sparing whole-brain radiotherapy: a "how-to" technique using helical tomotherapy and linear accelerator-based intensity-modulated radiotherapy.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.01.039
复制
发表时间:
2010-11-15
影响因子:
7
通讯作者:
Tome, Wolfgang A.
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Gondi, Vinai;Tolakanahalli, Ranjini;Mehta, Minesh P.;Tewatia, Dinesh;Rowley, Howard;Kuo, John S.;Khuntia, Deepak;Tome, Wolfgang A.
关键词:
Sparing the hippocampus during cranial irradiation poses important technical challenges with respect to contouring and treatment planning. Herein, we report our preliminary experience with whole-brain radiotherapy using hippocampal sparing for patients with brain metastases. 5 anonymous patients previously treated with whole-brain radiotherapy with hippocampal sparing were reviewed. The hippocampus was contoured, and hippocampal avoidance regions were created using a 5mm volumetric expansion around the hippocampus. Helical tomotherapy and LINAC-based IMRT treatment plans were generated for a prescription dose of 30 Gy in 10 fractions. On average, the hippocampal avoidance volume was 3.3 cm3, occupying 2.1% of the whole brain planned target volume. Helical tomotherapy spared the hippocampus, with a median dose of 5.5 Gy and maximum dose of 12.8 Gy. LINAC-based IMRT spared the hippocampus, with a median dose of 7.8 Gy and maximum dose of 15.3 Gy. On a per-fraction basis, mean dose to the hippocampus (normalized to 2-Gy fractions) was reduced by 87% to 0.49 Gy2 using helical tomotherapy and by 81% to 0.73 Gy2 using LINAC-based IMRT. Target coverage and homogeneity was acceptable with both IMRT modalities, with differences largely attributed to more rapid dose fall-off with helical tomotherapy. Modern IMRT techniques allow for sparing of the hippocampus with acceptable target coverage and homogeneity. Based on compelling preclinical evidence, a phase II cooperative group trial has been developed to test the postulated neurocognitive benefit.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
82.9
作者:
Eriksson, PS;Perfilieva, E;Gage, FH
通讯作者:
Gage, FH
影响因子:
--
作者:
Nagai, R;Tsunoda, S;Asada, H
通讯作者:
Asada, H
DOI:
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2005.04.011
发表时间:
2005-08-01
影响因子:
7
作者:
Van Vulpen, M;Field, C;Fallone, BG
通讯作者:
Fallone, BG
影响因子:
2.9
作者:
COLLIER, TJ;QUIRK, GJ;ROUTTENBERG, A
通讯作者:
ROUTTENBERG, A
影响因子:
64.8
作者:
Kempermann, G;Kuhn, HG;Gage, FH
通讯作者:
Gage, FH