Can the absence of prejudice be more threatening than its presence? It depends on one's worldview.
Can the absence of prejudice be more threatening than its presence? It depends on one's worldview.
复制标题
没有偏见会比有偏见更具威胁性吗？
DOI：
10.1037/a0020434
复制
发表时间：
2010
影响因子：
7.6
通讯作者：
Mendes,WendyBerry
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Townsend,SarahSM;Major,Brenda;Sawyer,PamelaJ;Mendes,WendyBerry
本研究采用经验证的心血管措施，以检查威胁反应的成员之间的污名化的群体与成员的nonstigmatized群体谁是，或没有，对他们的群体的偏见。作者假设，人们对身份系统公平性的信念会缓和他们在群体间互动中的威胁体验。作者预测，对于那些认为身份制度是公平的污名化群体的成员来说，与有偏见的伴侣互动相比，与无偏见的伴侣互动，会使他们的世界观变得不真实，并导致更大的威胁。相比之下，作者预测，对于那些认为系统不公平的污名化群体的成员来说，与偏见的伴侣互动，与与无偏见的伴侣互动相比，会确认他们的世界观，并导致更少的威胁。作者在拉丁裔与白色女性同盟者（研究1）和白色女性与白色男性同盟者（研究2）之间进行了这些预测。正如所预测的那样，人们对地位系统公平性的信念在组间互动中调节了他们的威胁体验，这一点通过心血管反应和非语言行为来表示。在两项研究中，调节的具体模式不同。
The present research used validated cardiovascular measures to examine threat reactions among members of stigmatized groups when interacting with members of nonstigmatized groups who were, or were not, prejudiced against their group. The authors hypothesized that people's beliefs about the fairness of the status system would moderate their experience of threat during intergroup interactions. The authors predicted that for members of stigmatized groups who believe the status system is fair, interacting with a prejudiced partner, compared with interacting with an unprejudiced partner, would disconfirm their worldview and result in greater threat. In contrast, the authors predicted that for members of stigmatized groups who believe the system is unfair, interacting with a prejudiced partner, compared with interacting with an unprejudiced partner, would confirm their worldview and result in less threat. The authors examined these predictions among Latinas interacting with a White female confederate (Study 1) and White females interacting with a White male confederate (Study 2). As predicted, people's beliefs about the fairness of the status system moderated their experiences of threat during intergroup interactions, indicated both by cardiovascular responses and nonverbal behavior. The specific pattern of the moderation differed across the 2 studies.
登录
查看更多内容
偏见：目标的观点
DOI：
10.2307/2655298
发表时间：
1999
期刊：
影响因子：
--
作者：
J. Swim;C. Stangor
通讯作者：
C. Stangor
影响因子：
16.4
作者：
R. Clark;N. Anderson;V. Clark;David R. Williams
通讯作者：
David R. Williams
背景下的种族认同：肯尼思·B·克拉克的遗产。
DOI：
10.1037/10812-000
发表时间：
2004
期刊：
--
影响因子：
--
作者：
G. Philogene
通讯作者：
G. Philogene
TRIOS：应对普遍种族主义背景的模型。
影响因子：
3.5
作者：
J. M. Jones
通讯作者：
J. M. Jones
地位和刻板印象如何影响歧视归因：刻板印象不对称假说
影响因子：
3.5
作者：
Laurie T. O’Brien;Zoe Kinias;B. Major
通讯作者：
B. Major