Large-scale assessment of the zebrafish embryo as a possible predictive model in toxicity testing.
Large-scale assessment of the zebrafish embryo as a possible predictive model in toxicity testing.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0021076
复制
发表时间:
2011
期刊:
影响因子:
3.7
通讯作者:
Richardson MK
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Ali S;van Mil HG;Richardson MK
In the drug discovery pipeline, safety pharmacology is a major issue. The zebrafish has been proposed as a model that can bridge the gap in this field between cell assays (which are cost-effective, but low in data content) and rodent assays (which are high in data content, but less cost-efficient). However, zebrafish assays are only likely to be useful if they can be shown to have high predictive power. We examined this issue by assaying 60 water-soluble compounds representing a range of chemical classes and toxicological mechanisms. Over 20,000 wild-type zebrafish embryos (including controls) were cultured individually in defined buffer in 96-well plates. Embryos were exposed for a 96 hour period starting at 24 hours post fertilization. A logarithmic concentration series was used for range-finding, followed by a narrower geometric series for LC50 determination. Zebrafish embryo LC50 (log mmol/L), and published data on rodent LD50 (log mmol/kg), were found to be strongly correlated (using Kendall's rank correlation tau and Pearson's product-moment correlation). The slope of the regression line for the full set of compounds was 0.73403. However, we found that the slope was strongly influenced by compound class. Thus, while most compounds had a similar toxicity level in both species, some compounds were markedly more toxic in zebrafish than in rodents, or vice versa. For the substances examined here, in aggregate, the zebrafish embryo model has good predictivity for toxicity in rodents. However, the correlation between zebrafish and rodent toxicity varies considerably between individual compounds and compound class. We discuss the strengths and limitations of the zebrafish model in light of these findings.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
3.4
作者:
MacPhail, R. C.;Brooks, J.;Padilla, S.
通讯作者:
Padilla, S.
影响因子:
3.7
作者:
Ali S;Champagne DL;Alia A;Richardson MK
通讯作者:
Richardson MK
影响因子:
17.1
作者:
Lee, Kerry J.;Nallathamby, Prakash D.;Xu, Xiao-Hong Nancy
通讯作者:
Xu, Xiao-Hong Nancy
影响因子:
2.5
作者:
KIMMEL, CB;BALLARD, WW;SCHILLING, TF
通讯作者:
SCHILLING, TF
影响因子:
8.8
作者:
Lanzky, PF;HallingSorensen, B
通讯作者:
HallingSorensen, B