Class, Electoral Geography and the Future of UKIP: Labour's Secret Weapon?

Class, Electoral Geography and the Future of UKIP: Labour's Secret Weapon?
复制标题

阶级、选举地理和英国独立党的未来:工党的秘密武器?

DOI:
10.1093/pa/gsv013
复制
发表时间:
2016
影响因子:
1.2
通讯作者:
Mellon J
Mellon J
中科院分区:
法学3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Mellon J

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

福特和古德温在对我们的文章的回复中认为,英国独立党的支持主要来自工人阶级,它可能成为工党的选举威胁,特别是在北方的席位上,而且自2010年以来,它已经获得了本来会投给工党的选票。我们提出证据反驳所有这些说法。首先,虽然工人阶级选民比其他阶层更有可能支持英国独立党,但从数字上看,英国独立党的大部分支持来自中产阶级。其次,使用投票倾向得分来衡量哪个政党的支持者可能成为英国独立党的沃土,我们发现:(i)45%的当前保守党支持者将英国独立党作为第二偏好,而工党支持者只有19%;(ii)与英格兰其他地区相比,英国独立党在北方席位的潜力略低,以及(iii)在没有英国独立党的情况下,英国独立党目前的支持者中,投工党票的可能性(20%)远远低于保守党(42%)。工党已经从英国独立党的存在中受益,并可能继续这样做。
In their reply to our article Ford and Goodwin argue that UKIP's support is derived primarily from the working class, that it may become an electoral threat for Labour, particularly in Northern seats, and that since 2010 it has taken votes that would otherwise have gone to Labour. We present evidence refuting all of these claims. First, while working class voters are a little more likely to support UKIP than other classes, numerically the bulk of UKIP's support comes from the middle classes. Second, using propensity to vote scores to measure which party's supporters are likely to be fertile ground for UKIP, we find that (i) 45% of current Conservative supporters have UKIP as a second preference, compared with only 19% of Labour supporters; (ii) the potential for UKIP is slightly lower in Northern seats compared with those in the rest of England and (iii) in the absence of UKIP, far fewer of UKIP's current supporters are likely to have voted Labour (20%) than Conservative (42%). Labour has benefitted from UKIP’s presence and is likely to continue to do so.
DOI: 10.1093/pa/gsv012
发表时间: 2016
影响因子: 1.2
作者:
R. Ford;M. Goodwin
通讯作者: M. Goodwin
补选对大选的影响:英格兰,1950-87 年
DOI: --
发表时间: 1991
影响因子: 5
作者:
G. Upton
通讯作者: G. Upton
DOI: 10.1017/s0022381610000654
发表时间: 2010-10-01
影响因子: 3.1
作者:
Evans, Geoffrey;Pickup, Mark
通讯作者: Pickup, Mark
DOI: 10.1016/j.electstud.2005.06.012
发表时间: 2006
期刊: Electoral Studies
影响因子: 2.3
作者:
C. Eijk;W. Brug;M. Kroh;M. Franklin
通讯作者: M. Franklin
规模很重要政治倾向、多数地位和多数规模对舆论误解的影响
DOI: --
发表时间: 2015
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
S. Dvir
通讯作者: S. Dvir