Comparative genomic analysis of fungal genomes reveals intron-rich ancestors.
Comparative genomic analysis of fungal genomes reveals intron-rich ancestors.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1186/gb-2007-8-10-r223
复制
发表时间:
2007
期刊:
影响因子:
12.3
通讯作者:
Roy SW
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Stajich JE;Dietrich FS;Roy SW
Analysis of intron gain and loss in fungal genomes provides support for an intron-rich fungus-animal ancestor. Eukaryotic protein-coding genes are interrupted by spliceosomal introns, which are removed from transcripts before protein translation. Many facets of spliceosomal intron evolution, including age, mechanisms of origins, the role of natural selection, and the causes of the vast differences in intron number between eukaryotic species, remain debated. Genome sequencing and comparative analysis has made possible whole genome analysis of intron evolution to address these questions. We analyzed intron positions in 1,161 sets of orthologous genes across 25 eukaryotic species. We find strong support for an intron-rich fungus-animal ancestor, with more than four introns per kilobase, comparable to the highest known modern intron densities. Indeed, the fungus-animal ancestor is estimated to have had more introns than any of the extant fungi in this study. Thus, subsequent fungal evolution has been characterized by widespread and recurrent intron loss occurring in all fungal clades. These results reconcile three previously proposed methods for estimation of ancestral intron number, which previously gave very different estimates of ancestral intron number for eight eukaryotic species, as well as a fourth more recent method. We do not find a clear inverse correspondence between rates of intron loss and gain, contrary to the predictions of selection-based proposals for interspecific differences in intron number. Our results underscore the high intron density of eukaryotic ancestors and the widespread importance of intron loss through eukaryotic evolution.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
11.4
作者:
Irimia, Manuel;Penny, David;Roy, Scott W.
通讯作者:
Roy, Scott W.
影响因子:
5.4
作者:
Haas BJ;Wortman JR;Ronning CM;Hannick LI;Smith RK Jr;Maiti R;Chan AP;Yu C;Farzad M;Wu D;White O;Town CD
通讯作者:
Town CD
影响因子:
14.9
作者:
Drysdale RA;Crosby MA;FlyBase Consortium
通讯作者:
FlyBase Consortium
影响因子:
64.8
作者:
James, Timothy Y.;Kauff, Frank;Vilgalys, Rytas
通讯作者:
Vilgalys, Rytas
影响因子:
3.3
作者:
Juneau, Kara;Miranda, Molly;Davis, Ronald W.
通讯作者:
Davis, Ronald W.