Implantation of cauda equina nerve roots through a biodegradable scaffold at the conus medullaris in rat.
Implantation of cauda equina nerve roots through a biodegradable scaffold at the conus medullaris in rat.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1016/j.spinee.2014.01.059
复制
发表时间:
2014-09-01
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Windebank AJ
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Grahn PJ;Vaishya S;Knight AM;Chen BK;Schmeichel AM;Currier BL;Spinner RJ;Yaszemski MJ;Windebank AJ
Traumatic injuries occurring at the conus medullaris of the spinal cord cause both permanent damage to the central nervous system, and to the cauda equina nerve roots. This proof of concept study determined whether implanting the nerve roots into a biodegradable scaffold would improve regeneration after injury. All experimental work involving rats was performed according to approved guidelines by the Mayo Clinic Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC). Surgical procedures were performed on 32 Sprague Dawley rats. Four ventral cauda equina nerve roots were re-implanted either directly into the ventral cord stump or through a poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) scaffold. These experimental groups were compared to a control group in which the nerves were inserted into a muscle fascia barrier that was placed between the spinal cord and nerve roots. Animals were sacrificed at four weeks. This work was funded by the authors' institution; Morton Cure Paralysis Fund; The Craig H. Neilsen Foundation; and NIBIB grant R01 EB 02390. There was no conflict of interest between the study funding and the conclusions drawn. There was no difference in motor neuron counts in the spinal cord rostral to the injury in all treatment groups, implying equal potential for regeneration into implanted nerve roots. One-way ANOVA testing, with Tukey's post-test, showed a statistically significant improvement in axon regeneration through the injury in the PLGA scaffold treatment group compared to the control (p<0.05, scaffold n=11, control n=11). This pilot study demonstrated that a PLGA scaffold improved regeneration of axons into peripheral nerve roots. However, the number of regenerating axons observed was limited and did not lead to functional recovery. Future experiments will employ a different scaffold material and possible growth factors or enzymes to increase axon populations.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
4.8
作者:
de Ruiter, Godard C.;Spinner, Robert J.;Windebank, Anthony J.
通讯作者:
Windebank, Anthony J.
DOI:
10.5435/jaaos-20-02-063
发表时间:
2012-02-01
影响因子:
3.2
作者:
Deal, D. Nicole;Griffin, Justin W.;Hogan, MaCalus V.
通讯作者:
Hogan, MaCalus V.
影响因子:
14.5
作者:
Ibrahim, Ahmed G.;Kirkwood, Peter A.;Li, Ying
通讯作者:
Li, Ying
影响因子:
4.1
作者:
Rooney, Gemma E.;Knight, Andrew M.;Windebank, Anthony J.
通讯作者:
Windebank, Anthony J.
影响因子:
4.1
作者:
de Ruiter GC;Malessy MJ;Yaszemski MJ;Windebank AJ;Spinner RJ
通讯作者:
Spinner RJ