Development of home cage social behaviors in BALB/cJ vs. C57BL/6J mice.
Development of home cage social behaviors in BALB/cJ vs. C57BL/6J mice.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1016/j.bbr.2012.08.051
复制
发表时间:
2013-01-15
影响因子:
2.7
通讯作者:
Brodkin, Edward S.
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Fairless, Andrew H.;Katz, Julia M.;Vijayvargiya, Neha;Dow, Holly C.;Kreibich, Arati Sadalge;Berrettini, Wade H.;Abel, Ted;Brodkin, Edward S.
BALB/cJ and C57BL/6J inbred mouse strains have been proposed as useful models of low and high levels of sociability (tendency to seek social interaction), respectively, based primarily on behaviors of ~30-day-old mice in the Social Approach Test (SAT). In the SAT, approach and sniffing behaviors of a test mouse toward an unfamiliar stimulus mouse are measured in a novel environment. However, it is unclear whether such results generalize to a familiar environment with a familiar social partner, such as with a littermate in a home cage environment. We hypothesized that C57BL/6J mice would show higher levels of social behaviors than BALB/cJ mice in the home cage environment, particularly at 30 days-of-age. We measured active and passive social behaviors in home cages by pairs of BALB/cJ or C57BL/6J littermates at ages 30, 41, and 69 days. The strains did not differ robustly in their active social behaviors. C57BL/6J mice were more passively social than BALB/cJ mice at 30 days, and C57BL/6J levels of passive social behaviors declined to BALB/cJ levels by 69 days. The differences in passive social behaviors at 30 days-of-age were primarily attributable to differences in huddling. These results indicate that different test conditions (SAT conditions vs. home cage conditions) elicit strain differences in distinct types of behaviors (approach/sniffing vs. huddling behaviors, respectively). Assessment of the more naturalistic social interactions in the familiar home cage environment with a familiar littermate will provide a useful component of a comprehensive assessment of social behaviors in mouse models relevant to autism.
登录
查看更多内容
DOI:
10.1002/ar.21318
发表时间:
2011-10
影响因子:
2
作者:
Fairless, Andrew H.;Shah, Rhia Y.;Guthrie, Ashley J.;Li, Hongzhe;Brodkin, Edward S.
通讯作者:
Brodkin, Edward S.
影响因子:
--
作者:
Jones, Warren;Carr, Katelin;Klin, Ami
通讯作者:
Klin, Ami
影响因子:
2.7
作者:
Dahlhaus, Regina;El-Husseini, Alaa
通讯作者:
El-Husseini, Alaa
影响因子:
3.8
作者:
Jacome, Luis F.;Burket, Jessica A.;Deutsch, Stephen I.
通讯作者:
Deutsch, Stephen I.
影响因子:
4.7
作者:
Chadman, Kathryn K.;Gong, Shiaoching;Crawley, Jacqueline N.
通讯作者:
Crawley, Jacqueline N.