Development of home cage social behaviors in BALB/cJ vs. C57BL/6J mice.

Development of home cage social behaviors in BALB/cJ vs. C57BL/6J mice.
复制标题

DOI:
10.1016/j.bbr.2012.08.051
复制
发表时间:
2013-01-15
影响因子:
2.7
通讯作者:
Brodkin, Edward S.
Brodkin, Edward S.
中科院分区:
心理学3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Fairless, Andrew H.;Katz, Julia M.;Vijayvargiya, Neha;Dow, Holly C.;Kreibich, Arati Sadalge;Berrettini, Wade H.;Abel, Ted;Brodkin, Edward S.

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

BALB/cJ和C57 BL/6 J近交系小鼠品系已被提出分别作为低水平和高水平社交性(寻求社会互动的倾向)的有用模型,主要基于~30日龄小鼠在社会接近测试(SAT)中的行为。在SAT中,在新的环境中测量测试小鼠对不熟悉的刺激小鼠的接近和嗅闻行为。然而,目前还不清楚这些结果是否适用于熟悉的环境与熟悉的社会伙伴,如与窝在一个家庭笼环境。我们假设,C57 BL/6 J小鼠将显示出更高水平的社会行为比BALB/cJ小鼠在家庭笼环境中,特别是在30日龄。我们测量了主动和被动的社会行为,在家庭笼对BALB/cJ或C57 BL/6 J同窝仔在年龄30,41,和69天。菌株在积极的社会行为方面没有明显差异。在30天时,C57 BL/6 J小鼠比BALB/cJ小鼠更被动地社交,并且C57 BL/6 J小鼠的被动社交行为水平在69天时下降到BALB/cJ小鼠的水平。30日龄时被动社会行为的差异主要归因于蜷缩行为的差异。这些结果表明,不同的测试条件(SAT条件与饲养笼条件)在不同类型的行为(分别为接近/嗅探与蜷缩行为)中引起应变差异。评估更自然的社会互动,在熟悉的家庭笼环境与熟悉的同窝将提供一个有用的组成部分,全面评估社会行为的小鼠模型相关的自闭症。
BALB/cJ and C57BL/6J inbred mouse strains have been proposed as useful models of low and high levels of sociability (tendency to seek social interaction), respectively, based primarily on behaviors of ~30-day-old mice in the Social Approach Test (SAT). In the SAT, approach and sniffing behaviors of a test mouse toward an unfamiliar stimulus mouse are measured in a novel environment. However, it is unclear whether such results generalize to a familiar environment with a familiar social partner, such as with a littermate in a home cage environment. We hypothesized that C57BL/6J mice would show higher levels of social behaviors than BALB/cJ mice in the home cage environment, particularly at 30 days-of-age. We measured active and passive social behaviors in home cages by pairs of BALB/cJ or C57BL/6J littermates at ages 30, 41, and 69 days. The strains did not differ robustly in their active social behaviors. C57BL/6J mice were more passively social than BALB/cJ mice at 30 days, and C57BL/6J levels of passive social behaviors declined to BALB/cJ levels by 69 days. The differences in passive social behaviors at 30 days-of-age were primarily attributable to differences in huddling. These results indicate that different test conditions (SAT conditions vs. home cage conditions) elicit strain differences in distinct types of behaviors (approach/sniffing vs. huddling behaviors, respectively). Assessment of the more naturalistic social interactions in the familiar home cage environment with a familiar littermate will provide a useful component of a comprehensive assessment of social behaviors in mouse models relevant to autism.
DOI: 10.1002/ar.21318
发表时间: 2011-10
影响因子: 2
作者:
Fairless, Andrew H.;Shah, Rhia Y.;Guthrie, Ashley J.;Li, Hongzhe;Brodkin, Edward S.
通讯作者: Brodkin, Edward S.
DOI: 10.1001/archpsyc.65.8.946
发表时间: 2008-08-01
影响因子: --
作者:
Jones, Warren;Carr, Katelin;Klin, Ami
通讯作者: Klin, Ami
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2009.11.019
发表时间: 2010-03-17
影响因子: 2.7
作者:
Dahlhaus, Regina;El-Husseini, Alaa
通讯作者: El-Husseini, Alaa
DOI: 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2010.10.010
发表时间: 2011-01-15
影响因子: 3.8
作者:
Jacome, Luis F.;Burket, Jessica A.;Deutsch, Stephen I.
通讯作者: Deutsch, Stephen I.
DOI: 10.1002/aur.22
发表时间: 2008-06-01
期刊: AUTISM RESEARCH
影响因子: 4.7
作者:
Chadman, Kathryn K.;Gong, Shiaoching;Crawley, Jacqueline N.
通讯作者: Crawley, Jacqueline N.