Slow Is Also Fast: Feedback Delay Affects Anxiety and Outcome Evaluation.
Slow Is Also Fast: Feedback Delay Affects Anxiety and Outcome Evaluation.
复制标题
慢也是快:反馈延迟影响焦虑和结果评估
DOI:
10.3389/fnhum.2018.00020
复制
发表时间:
2018
影响因子:
2.9
通讯作者:
Li H
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Zhang X;Lei Y;Yin H;Li P;Li H
Performance-related feedback plays an important role in improving human being’s adaptive behavior. Using event-related potentials (ERPs), previous studies have associated a particular component, i.e., reward positivity (RewP), with outcome evaluation processing and found that this component was affected by waiting time before outcome evaluation. Prior research has also suggested that anxious individuals are more prone to detecting threats and susceptible to negative emotions, and show different patterns of brain activity in outcome evaluation. It is quite common that a decision-maker cannot receive feedback immediately; however, few studies have focused on the processing of delayed feedback, especially in subjects who exhibit trait anxiety. In this study, we recruited two groups of subjects with different trait anxiety levels and recorded ERPs when they conducted a time-estimation task with short (0.6–1 s) or long delayed (4–5 s) feedback. The ERP results during the cue phase showed that long waiting cues elicited more negative-going feedback-related negativity (FRN)-like component than short waiting cues in the high trait anxiety (HTA) group. More importantly, the two groups showed different patterns of ERP in the feedback condition. In the low trait anxiety (LTA) group, more positive-going RewP was found in the short-delayed than in the long-delayed condition. In contrast, no difference was found in the HTA group. This pattern may reflect the hyperactivity of the reward systems of HTA individuals in uncertain environments (e.g., the long-delay condition) compared with LTA individuals. Our results provide a direction for future research on the neural mechanisms of reinforcement learning and anxiety.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
3.7
作者:
Dennis TA;Chen CC
通讯作者:
Chen CC
影响因子:
16.2
作者:
Fanselow, Michael S.;Dong, Hong-Wei
通讯作者:
Dong, Hong-Wei
影响因子:
5.3
作者:
Ferdinand, Nicola K.;Mecklinger, Axel;Gehring, William J.
通讯作者:
Gehring, William J.
影响因子:
2.6
作者:
Foti, Dan;Hajcak, Greg
通讯作者:
Hajcak, Greg
影响因子:
3
作者:
Alexander WH;Brown JW
通讯作者:
Brown JW