Not quite so blind: Semantic processing despite inattentional blindness.

Not quite so blind: Semantic processing despite inattentional blindness.
复制标题

并非那么盲目:尽管无意识失明,但仍进行语义处理

DOI:
10.1037/xhp0000205
复制
发表时间:
2016
期刊:
Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Memmert
Memmert
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
Schnuerch;Kreitz;Gibbons;Memmert

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

当我们的注意力在其他方面时,我们经常无法发现清晰可见但意想不到的物体,这种现象被广泛称为无意视盲。人们对这种意识缺失的潜在破坏性后果和介导因素进行了广泛的研究。然而,令人惊讶的是,关于我们是否以及如何处理无意视盲期间未被注意到的物体,几乎一无所知。在2个实验中,我们证明,由于无意视盲的对象未被检测到的意义干扰的分类出席的刺激。反应显着较慢时,未被发现的刺激的语义内容相矛盾的出席,待判断的对象。因此,我们澄清了由注意力不集中引起的“失明”的深度,因为我们提供了令人信服的证据,即未能检测到意外并不妨碍其处理,即使在后知觉阶段。尽管存在无意视盲,但我们的大脑显然仍然可以获得像意义这样精致的东西。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c)2023阿帕,保留所有权利)
We often fail to detect clearly visible, yet unexpected objects when our attention is otherwise engaged, a phenomenon widely known as inattentional blindness. The potentially devastating consequences and the mediators of such failures of awareness have been studied extensively. Surprisingly, however, hardly anything is known about whether and how we process the objects that go unnoticed during inattentional blindness. In 2 experiments, we demonstrate that the meaning of objects undetected due to inattentional blindness interferes with the classification of attended stimuli. Responses were significantly slower when the semantic content of an undetected stimulus contradicted that of the attended, to-be-judged object. We thus clarify the depth of the “blindness” caused by inattention, as we provide compelling evidence that failing to detect the unexpected does not preclude its processing, even at postperceptual stages. Despite inattentional blindness, our mind obviously still has access to something as refined as meaning.(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved)
DOI: 10.1037/a0022474
发表时间: 2011
期刊: Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition
影响因子: --
作者:
Janelle K. Seegmiller;J. Watson;D. Strayer
通讯作者: D. Strayer
DOI: 10.2478/v10053-008-0087-z
发表时间: 2011
影响因子: 1.2
作者:
Ansorge U;Horstmann G;Scharlau I
通讯作者: Scharlau I
DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2010.02.002
发表时间: 2010
影响因子: 2.4
作者:
Preston P. Thakral;S. Slotnick
通讯作者: S. Slotnick
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4757-2131-7_17
发表时间: 1991
期刊: --
影响因子: --
作者:
R. Haines
通讯作者: R. Haines
DOI: 10.1111/1467-9280.00303
发表时间: 2001-01-01
影响因子: 8.2
作者:
Most, SB;Simons, DJ;Chabris, CF
通讯作者: Chabris, CF