Rapid Evidence Review of Community Engagement and Resources in the UK during the COVID-19 Pandemic: How Can Community Assets Redress Health Inequities?
Rapid Evidence Review of Community Engagement and Resources in the UK during the COVID-19 Pandemic: How Can Community Assets Redress Health Inequities?
复制标题
DOI：
10.3390/ijerph19074086
复制
发表时间：
2022-03-30
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Chatterjee HJ
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Mughal R;Thomson LJM;Daykin N;Chatterjee HJ
社区参与，如参加艺术，自然或休闲活动，与心理和生理健康呈正相关。在COVID-19疫情期间，社区参与促进了个人之间的非正式和当地互助。这项快速证据审查评估了英国社区为应对COVID-19大流行而出现的以社区为基础的艺术、自然、音乐、戏剧和其他类型的文化参与。在这方面，我们侧重于所有社区参与，次级重点是弱势群体获得和针对弱势群体的规定。其中包括2020年2月至2021年1月期间创建的五十六项资源。通过Google Scholar、PubMed、Web of Science、MedRXic、PsycharXiv和搜索灰色文献和公共领域的项目确定资源。大多数国家报告说，服务已调整为在线、电话或在离家很远的地方提供。使用了若干质量评估框架来评价数据质量。虽然识别出了一些同行评审的灰色文献和公共领域文章，但识别出的文献中只有不到一半符合质量阈值。对这一流行病的反应速度可能意味着并不总是有强有力的评价程序。
Community engagement, such as participating in arts, nature or leisurely activities, is positively associated with psychological and physiological wellbeing. Community-based engagement during the COVID-19 pandemic facilitated informal and local mutual aid between individuals. This rapid evidence review assesses the emergence of community-based arts, nature, music, theatre and other types of cultural engagement amongst UK communities in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Here, we focus on all community engagement with a sub-focus on provisions accessed by and targeted towards vulnerable groups. Two hundred and fifty-six resources were included that had been created between February 2020 and January 2021. Resources were identified through Google Scholar, PubMed, Web of Science, MedRXic, PsycharXiv and searches for grey literature and items in the public domain. The majority reported services that had been adapted to become online, telephone-based or delivered at a distance from doorsteps. Several quality assessment frameworks were used to evaluate the quality of data. Whilst a number of peer-reviewed, grey literature and public domain articles were identified, less than half of the identified literature met quality thresholds. The pace of the response to the pandemic may have meant that robust evaluation procedures were not always in place.
登录
查看更多内容
DOI：
10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113221
发表时间：
2020-09
期刊：
Social science & medicine (1982)
影响因子：
--
作者：
Fancourt D;Baxter L
通讯作者：
Baxter L
影响因子：
13.2
作者：
Buckley R;Westaway D
通讯作者：
Westaway D
DOI：
10.3390/ijerph17249401
发表时间：
2020-12-15
影响因子：
--
作者：
Blake H;Yildirim M;Wood B;Knowles S;Mancini H;Coyne E;Cooper J
通讯作者：
Cooper J
影响因子：
9.5
作者：
Hacker, Janine;vom Brocke, Jan;Schneider, Johannes
通讯作者：
Schneider, Johannes
对自我引导的干预措施的快速审查和荟萃分析，以解决COVID-19社会疏远期间的焦虑，抑郁和压力。
影响因子：
3.8
作者：
Fischer R;Bortolini T;Karl JA;Zilberberg M;Robinson K;Rabelo A;Gemal L;Wegerhoff D;Nguyễn TBT;Irving B;Chrystal M;Mattos P
通讯作者：
Mattos P