COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among the adult population in Bangladesh: A nationwide cross-sectional survey.

COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among the adult population in Bangladesh: A nationwide cross-sectional survey.
复制标题

孟加拉国成年人口对 COVID-19 疫苗的犹豫:一项全国横断面调查。

DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0260821
复制
发表时间:
2021
期刊:
影响因子:
3.7
通讯作者:
Mamun AA
Mamun AA
中科院分区:
综合性期刊3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Hossain MB;Alam MZ;Islam MS;Sultan S;Faysal MM;Rima S;Hossain MA;Mamun AA

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

尽管越来越有必要了解与疫苗接种相关的人群行为,但在孟加拉国,与 COVID-19 疫苗犹豫相关的研究还很少。因此,本研究旨在评估孟加拉国对 COVID-19 疫苗犹豫的流行情况及其相关因素,以填补知识空白。本研究采用横断面设计,通过 2021 年 2 月 1 日至 7 日期间对孟加拉国八个行政区的 1497 名受访者进行在线(谷歌表格)和面对面访谈收集数据。我们采用了描述性统计和多元逻辑回归分析。疫苗犹豫的发生率为46.2%。穆斯林(aOR = 1.80,p ≤ 0.01)和居住在城市公司区域的受访者(aOR = 2.14,p ≤ 0.001)有更多的犹豫。不同行政区划(地理区域)的疫苗犹豫度存在显着差异。与锡尔赫特赛区相比,库尔纳赛区的参与者(aOR = 1.31,p ≤0.001)犹豫度更高。随着对疫苗(aOR = 0.88,p≤0.001)和疫苗接种过程(aOR = 0.91,p ≤ 0.01)了解的增加,疫苗犹豫度趋于减少。另一方面,随着对疫苗的负面态度(aOR = 1.17,p≤0.001)和对 COVID-19 疫苗的阴谋信念(aOR = 1.04,p≤0.01)的增加,犹豫也随之增加。 COVID-19 疫苗接种的感知益处(aOR = 0.85,p≤0.001)与犹豫呈负相关,而感知障碍(aOR = 1.16,p ≤0.001)与犹豫呈正相关。参与者对于接受来自特定原产国(印度、美国、欧洲)的疫苗更加犹豫。我们的研究结果表明,应设计和实施强有力的行为改变沟通活动,以揭开孟加拉国公众对 COVID-19 疫苗的负面态度和阴谋论的神秘面纱。政策制定者还应考虑重新审视接受 COVID-19 疫苗的在线注册流程政策,因为由于该国持续存在的数字鸿沟,在线注册对许多人来说是一个关键的结构性障碍。最后,政府应考虑民众对疫苗生产国的偏好,以减少对 COVID-19 疫苗的犹豫。
Studies related to the COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy are scanty in Bangladesh, despite the growing necessity of understanding the population behavior related to vaccination. Thus, the present study was conducted to assess the prevalence of the COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and its associated factors in Bangladesh to fill the knowledge gap. This study adopted a cross-sectional design to collect data from 1497 respondents using online (Google forms) and face-to-face interviews from eight administrative divisions of Bangladesh between 1–7 February 2021. We employed descriptive statistics and multiple logistic regression analysis. The prevalence of vaccine hesitancy was 46.2%. The Muslims (aOR = 1.80, p ≤ 0.01) and the respondents living in the city corporation areas (aOR = 2.14, p ≤0.001) had more hesitancy. There was significant variation in vaccine hesitancy by administrative divisions (geographic regions). Compared to the Sylhet division, the participants from Khulna (aOR = 1.31, p ≤0.001) had higher hesitancy. The vaccine hesitancy tended to decrease with increasing knowledge about the vaccine (aOR = 0.88, p≤0.001) and the vaccination process (aOR = 0.91, p ≤ 0.01). On the other hand, hesitancy increased with the increased negative attitudes towards the vaccine (aOR = 1.17, p≤0.001) and conspiracy beliefs towards the COVID-19 vaccine (aOR = 1.04, p≤0.01). The perceived benefits of COVID-19 vaccination (aOR = 0.85, p≤0.001) were negatively associated with hesitancy, while perceived barriers (aOR = 1.16, p ≤0.001) were positively associated. The participants were more hesitant to accept the vaccine from a specific country of origin (India, USA, Europe). Our findings warrant that a vigorous behavior change communication campaign should be designed and implemented to demystify negative public attitudes and conspiracy beliefs regarding the COVID-19 Vaccine in Bangladesh. The policymakers should also think about revisiting the policy of the online registration process to receive the COVID-19 vaccine, as online registration is a key structural barrier for many due to the persistent digital divide in the country. Finally, the government should consider the population’s preference regarding vaccines’ country of manufacture to reduce the COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy.
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250495
发表时间: 2021
期刊: PloS one
影响因子: 3.7
作者:
Abedin M;Islam MA;Rahman FN;Reza HM;Hossain MZ;Hossain MA;Arefin A;Hossain A
通讯作者: Hossain A
DOI: 10.1080/01459740.2020.1745481
发表时间: 2020-03-28
影响因子: 2.3
作者:
Ali, Inayat
通讯作者: Ali, Inayat
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246970
发表时间: 2021
期刊: PloS one
影响因子: 3.7
作者:
Latkin CA;Dayton L;Yi G;Colon B;Kong X
通讯作者: Kong X
DOI: 10.1186/s12889-021-11071-6
发表时间: 2021-06-12
期刊: BMC public health
影响因子: 4.5
作者:
Syed Alwi SAR;Rafidah E;Zurraini A;Juslina O;Brohi IB;Lukas S
通讯作者: Lukas S
DOI: 10.3390/vaccines9010016
发表时间: 2020-12-30
期刊: Vaccines
影响因子: 7.8
作者:
Lin C;Tu P;Beitsch LM
通讯作者: Beitsch LM