Functional priorities, assistive technology, and brain-computer interfaces after spinal cord injury.

Functional priorities, assistive technology, and brain-computer interfaces after spinal cord injury.
复制标题

DOI:
10.1682/jrrd.2011.11.0213
复制
发表时间:
2013
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Weber DJ
Weber DJ
中科院分区:
其他
文献类型:
--
作者:
Collinger JL;Boninger ML;Bruns TM;Curley K;Wang W;Weber DJ

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

脊髓损伤经常影响一个人进行关键日常生活活动的能力,并可能对他们的生活质量产生负面影响。辅助技术旨在弥合这一差距,以增强功能和提高独立性。随着脑机接口(BCI)等新技术的发展,让消费者参与设计和评估过程至关重要。在一项对57名参加全国退伍军人轮椅运动会的脊髓损伤退伍军人的调查研究中,我们发现恢复膀胱/肠道控制、行走和手臂/手功能(仅限四肢瘫痪)都是提高生活质量的首要任务。许多参与者没有使用或听说过一些目前可用来改善功能或与其环境互动的能力的技术。这项研究中的大多数人都对使用脑机接口感兴趣,特别是在控制功能性电刺激以恢复失去的功能方面。独立运行被认为是最重要的设计标准。有趣的是,许多参与者报告说,他们愿意考虑手术植入脑机接口,尽管非侵入性是高度优先的设计要求。这项调查显示了脊髓损伤患者对接受BCI并为其设计做出贡献的兴趣。
Spinal cord injury often impacts a person’s ability to perform critical activities of daily living and can have a negative impact on their quality of life. Assistive technology aims to bridge this gap to augment function and increase independence. It is critical to involve consumers in the design and evaluation process as new technologies, like brain-computer interfaces (BCIs), are developed. In a survey study of fifty-seven veterans with spinal cord injury who were participating in the National Veterans Wheelchair Games, we found that restoration of bladder/bowel control, walking, and arm/hand function (tetraplegia only) were all high priorities for improving quality of life. Many of the participants had not used or heard of some currently available technologies designed to improve function or the ability to interact with their environment. The majority of individuals in this study were interested in using a BCI, particularly for controlling functional electrical stimulation to restore lost function. Independent operation was considered to be the most important design criteria. Interestingly, many participants reported that they would be willing to consider surgery to implant a BCI even though non-invasiveness was a high priority design requirement. This survey demonstrates the interest of individuals with spinal cord injury in receiving and contributing to the design of BCI.
DOI: 10.1038/sc.2008.82
发表时间: 2009-02-01
期刊: SPINAL CORD
影响因子: 2.2
作者:
Barker, R. N.;Kendall, M. D.;Kuipers, P.
通讯作者: Kuipers, P.
DOI: 10.3171/2009.4.focus0977
发表时间: 2009-07-01
影响因子: 4.1
作者:
Blakely, Tim;Miller, Kai J.;Ojemann, Jeffrey G.
通讯作者: Ojemann, Jeffrey G.
DOI: 10.1089/089771502753460222
发表时间: 2002-01-01
影响因子: 4.2
作者:
Curt, A;Bruehlmeier, M;Dietz, V
通讯作者: Dietz, V
DOI: 10.3109/09638280903420325
发表时间: 2010-01-01
影响因子: 2.2
作者:
Hammell, Karen R. Whalley
通讯作者: Hammell, Karen R. Whalley
DOI: 10.1038/nature04970
发表时间: 2006-07-13
期刊: NATURE
影响因子: 64.8
作者:
Hochberg, Leigh R.;Serruya, Mijail D.;Donoghue, John P.
通讯作者: Donoghue, John P.