Sex-related Differences in Stress Reactivity and Cingulum White Matter.
Sex-related Differences in Stress Reactivity and Cingulum White Matter.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1016/j.neuroscience.2021.02.014
复制
发表时间:
2021-04-01
期刊:
影响因子:
3.3
通讯作者:
Knight DC
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Wheelock MD;Goodman AM;Harnett NG;Wood KH;Mrug S;Granger DA;Knight DC
The prefrontal cortex and limbic system are important components of the neural circuit that underlies stress and anxiety. These brain regions are connected by white matter tracts that support neural communication including the cingulum, uncinate fasciculus, and the fornix/stria-terminalis. Determining the relationship between stress reactivity and these white matter tracts may provide new insight into factors that underlie stress susceptibility and resilience. Therefore, the present study investigated sex differences in the relationship between stress reactivity and generalized fractional anisotropy (GFA) of the white matter tracts that link the prefrontal cortex and limbic system. Diffusion weighted images were collected and deterministic tractography was completed in 104 young adults (55 men, 49 women; mean age = 18.87 SEM = 0.08). Participants also completed self-report questionnaires (e.g., Trait Anxiety) and donated saliva (later assayed for cortisol) before, during, and after the Trier Social Stress Test. Results revealed that stress reactivity (area under the curve increase in cortisol) and GFA of the cingulum bundle varied by sex. Specifically, men demonstrated greater cortisol reactivity and greater GFA within the cingulum than women. Further, an interaction between sex, stress reactivity, and cingulum GFA was observed in which men demonstrated a positive relationship while women demonstrated a negative relationship between GFA and cortisol reactivity. Finally, trait anxiety was positively associated with the GFA of the fornix/stria terminalis - the white matter pathways that connect the hippocampus/amygdala to the hypothalamus. These findings advance our understanding of factors that underlie individual differences in stress reactivity.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
4.6
作者:
Eaton NR;Keyes KM;Krueger RF;Balsis S;Skodol AE;Markon KE;Grant BF;Hasin DS
通讯作者:
Hasin DS
DOI:
10.1523/jneurosci.3021-09.2010
发表时间:
2010-01-13
期刊:
The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience
影响因子:
--
作者:
Goldstein JM;Jerram M;Abbs B;Whitfield-Gabrieli S;Makris N
通讯作者:
Makris N
影响因子:
3.3
作者:
Het, Serkan;Schoofs, Daniela;Wolf, Oliver T.
通讯作者:
Wolf, Oliver T.
DOI:
10.1523/jneurosci.2335-09.2009
发表时间:
2009-09-16
期刊:
The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience
影响因子:
--
作者:
Kim MJ;Whalen PJ
通讯作者:
Whalen PJ
影响因子:
3.2
作者:
KIRSCHBAUM, C;PIRKE, KM;HELLHAMMER, DH
通讯作者:
HELLHAMMER, DH