The Illusion of Choice in Discussing Cybersecurity Safeguards Between Older Adults with Mild Cognitive Impairment and Their Caregivers

The Illusion of Choice in Discussing Cybersecurity Safeguards Between Older Adults with Mild Cognitive Impairment and Their Caregivers
复制标题

轻度认知障碍老年人及其照顾者之间讨论网络安全保障时的选择错觉

DOI:
10.1145/3415235
复制
发表时间:
2020
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Trendafilova, Zoya
Trendafilova, Zoya
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
Mentis, Helena M.;Madjaroff, Galina;Massey, Aaron;Trendafilova, Zoya

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

虽然持续的在线互动对轻度认知障碍的老年人有益,但网络安全风险可能会变得更加明显。之前的工作已经吹捧了护理接受者和护理人员之间共享决策的好处,他们可能希望灌输网络安全保障措施,特别是在在线安全和保障领域。在这项研究中,我们调查了目前的在线安全和安全决策的做法,轻度认知障碍的照顾者和他们的配偶照顾者。我们发现了选择性决策和实际决策之间的差距:虽然夫妇表达了他们参与共同决策的愿望,但实际情况是大多数照顾者被迫采取单独行动。我们进一步确定,共同决策是不可行的,因为缺乏合适的保障选项沿着的照顾范围,以供夫妇选择。我们将这些发现与先前的工作相关联,这些工作强调了类似的挑战,并讨论了如何需要提供更多的选择,而不仅仅是一种选择的错觉。
Although continual online interaction is beneficial for an older adult with mild cognitive impairment, cybersecurity risks can become more pronounced. Prior work has touted the benefit of shared decision-making between care recipients and caregivers who may want to instill cybersecurity safeguards, particularly in the area of online safety and security. In this study we investigated the current online safety and security decision-making practices of care recipients with mild cognitive impairment and their spousal caregivers. We identified a gap between optative and actual decision-making: whereas couples expressed their desire to engage in shared decision-making, the actuality was most caregivers were compelled to take sole action. We further determined that shared-decision making was not feasible as there was a lack of suitable safeguarding options along a spectrum of care for the couple to choose from. We relate these findings to prior work that highlights similar challenges and discuss how there needs to be more offered than simply an illusion of choice.
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-31680-7_15
发表时间: 2012-07
期刊: --
影响因子: --
作者:
Vaibhav Garg;L. Camp;Kay Connelly;Lesa Lorenzen-Huber
通讯作者: Vaibhav Garg;L. Camp;Kay Connelly;Lesa Lorenzen-Huber
通知和选择的局限性
DOI: --
发表时间: 2010
影响因子: 1.9
作者:
F. Cate
通讯作者: F. Cate
DOI: --
发表时间: 2011
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
Aaron K. Massey;A. Antón
通讯作者: A. Antón
护理人员活动时间调查 (CATS) 的内容和特性:用于阿尔茨海默病临床试验研究的结果衡量标准
DOI: --
发表时间: 1996
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
E. Clipp;M. Moore;L. George
通讯作者: L. George
DOI: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2014.06.019
发表时间: 2014-10
影响因子: 8.9
作者:
Knopman DS;Petersen RC
通讯作者: Petersen RC