Function follows form: activation of shape and function features during object identification.

Function follows form: activation of shape and function features during object identification.
复制标题

DOI:
10.1037/a0022840
复制
发表时间:
2011-08
影响因子:
4.1
通讯作者:
Thompson-Schill, Sharon L.
Thompson-Schill, Sharon L.
中科院分区:
心理学1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Yee, Eiling;Huffstetler, Stacy;Thompson-Schill, Sharon L.

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

大多数语义记忆理论都将给定对象的知识描述为包含一组语义特征。但是,在物体识别过程中,这些特征的概念激活是如何进行的呢?我们提出了一对实验的结果表明,对象识别是一个动态展开的过程中,功能遵循形式。我们使用眼球运动来探索激活一个物体的概念是否会导致其他共享感知(形状)或抽象(功能)特征的物体的激活。参与者观看四幅图片显示,并点击与听到的单词相对应的图片。在关键试验中,显示器中的一个对象的概念表示在形状或功能上是相似的(即,其目的),以听到的话。重要的是,这种相似性在视觉上并不明显(例如,对于目标“飞盘”,形状相关的物体是一个三角形的比萨饼片-飞盘不能采取的形状);因此,对相关物体的优先注视归因于相关特征上的概念表征的重叠。我们观察到形状和功能的相关性效应,但形状效应发生早于功能效应。我们讨论了这些发现的影响,目前的帐户表示的语义记忆。
Most theories of semantic memory characterize knowledge of a given object as comprising a set of semantic features. But how does conceptual activation of these features proceed during object identification? We present the results of a pair of experiments that demonstrate that object recognition is a dynamically unfolding process in which function follows form. We used eye movements to explore whether activating one object’s concept leads to the activation of others that share perceptual (shape) or abstract (function) features. Participants viewed four-picture displays and clicked on the picture corresponding to a heard word. In critical trials, the conceptual representation of one of the objects in the display was similar in shape or function (i.e., its purpose) to the heard word. Importantly, this similarity was not apparent in the visual depictions (e.g., for the target “frisbee,” the shape-related object was a triangular slice of pizza – a shape that a frisbee cannot take); preferential fixations on the related object were therefore attributable to overlap of the conceptual representations on the relevant features. We observed relatedness effects for both shape and function, but shape effects occurred earlier than function effects. We discuss the implications of these findings for current accounts of the representation of semantic memory.
DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2007.02.001
发表时间: 2007-11-01
影响因子: 4.3
作者:
Huettig, Falk;McQueen, James M.
通讯作者: McQueen, James M.
DOI: 10.3758/mc.37.7.1026
发表时间: 2009-10
期刊: Memory & cognition
影响因子: 2.4
作者:
Mirman D;Magnuson JS
通讯作者: Magnuson JS
DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.21.4.863
发表时间: 1995-07-01
影响因子: 2.6
作者:
MOSS, HE;OSTRIN, RK;MARSLENWILSON, WD
通讯作者: MARSLENWILSON, WD
DOI: 10.1037/0033-295x.111.1.205
发表时间: 2004-01-01
影响因子: 5.4
作者:
Rogers, TT;Ralph, MAL;Patterson, K
通讯作者: Patterson, K
DOI: 10.1080/13506280601130875
发表时间: 2007-01-01
期刊: VISUAL COGNITION
影响因子: 2
作者:
Huettig, Falk;Altmann, Gerry T. M.
通讯作者: Altmann, Gerry T. M.