An alternative scoring method for skin conductance responding in a differential fear conditioning paradigm with a long-duration conditioned stimulus.
An alternative scoring method for skin conductance responding in a differential fear conditioning paradigm with a long-duration conditioned stimulus.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1111/j.1469-8986.2009.00852.x
复制
发表时间：
2009-09
期刊：
影响因子：
3.7
通讯作者：
Orr SP
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Pineles SL;Orr MR;Orr SP
研究人员检查皮肤电导（SC）作为厌恶条件反射的测量，通常将SC反应分为两个部分，当CS-UCS间隔足够长时。这种惯例来自于早期的理论家，他们分别将第一间隔反应和第二间隔反应描述为测量定向反应和条件反应。本报告通过文献综述和对警察和消防员学员使用差异厌恶条件反射程序（n = 287）的大规模研究的二次数据分析，批判性地检验了这种评分方法。这项任务包括习惯化、习得和消失阶段，彩色圆圈作为CSs，冲击作为UCS。结果不支持将SC反应分为第一间隔反应和第二间隔反应的惯例。建议SC反应评分从整个CS-UCS区间获得的数据中得出。
Researchers examining skin conductance (SC) as a measure of aversive conditioning commonly separate the SC response into two components when the CS-UCS interval is sufficiently long. This convention drew from early theorists who described these components, the first- and second-interval responses, as measuring orienting and conditional responses, respectively. The present report critically examines this scoring method through a literature review and a secondary data analysis of a large-scale study of police and firefighter trainees that used a differential aversive conditioning procedure (n = 287). The task included habituation, acquisition, and extinction phases, with colored circles as the CSs and shocks as the UCS. Results do not support the convention of separating the SC response into first- and second-interval responses. It is recommended that SC response scores be derived from data obtained across the entire CS-UCS interval.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
3.7
作者：
DIMBERG, U;OHMAN, A
通讯作者：
OHMAN, A
影响因子：
2.6
作者：
FUHRER, MJ;BAER, PE
通讯作者：
BAER, PE
影响因子：
3.7
作者：
GALE, EN;AX, AF
通讯作者：
AX, AF
影响因子：
2.6
作者：
FREDRIKSON, M;HUGDAHL, K;OHMAN, A
通讯作者：
OHMAN, A
影响因子：
1.9
作者：
Cheng, Dominic T.;Knight, David C.;Helmstetter, Fred J.
通讯作者：
Helmstetter, Fred J.