Mentoring Interventions for Underrepresented Scholars in Biomedical and Behavioral Sciences: Effects on Quality of Mentoring Interactions and Discussions.
Mentoring Interventions for Underrepresented Scholars in Biomedical and Behavioral Sciences: Effects on Quality of Mentoring Interactions and Discussions.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1187/cbe.16-07-0215
复制
发表时间：
2017
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Ryan RM
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Lewis V;Martina CA;McDermott MP;Chaudron L;Trief PM;LaGuardia JG;Sharp D;Goodman SR;Morse GD;Ryan RM
导师教育和同伴指导可以扩大导师-学生讨论的范围，提高代表性不足的少数群体学者的二人时间质量。导师很少接受教育，了解生物医学和行为科学领域代表性不足的学者的独特需求。我们假设，对这些学者的导师培训和同行指导干预将丰富导师-门徒二人组之间讨论的感知质量和广度（即，师徒结对）。我们对150名代表性不足的导师-导师二人组进行了多中心随机研究，比较了：1）导师培训，2）门徒同伴指导，3）导师培训和同伴指导相结合，4）对照条件（即，指导的惯例）。在二次分析中，结果变量是二分体时间的质量和讨论的广度。Protégé参与者包括行为和生物医学研究以及医疗保健领域的研究生、研究员和初级教师。有导师培训的二人组比没有导师培训的二人组更有可能讨论教学和工作与生活的平衡。有同伴指导的二人组比没有同伴指导的二人组更有可能讨论临床护理和职业规划。相较于对照组，联合干预组更有可能感知到他们在一起的时间质量是好/优。我们的研究支持这些指导干预措施的价值，以提高二元讨论的广度和质量的时间在一起，一个良好的指导关系的重要组成部分。
Mentor education and peer mentoring can enhance the breadth of mentor–protégé discussions and quality of dyad time for underrepresented minority scholars. Mentors rarely receive education about the unique needs of underrepresented scholars in the biomedical and behavioral sciences. We hypothesized that mentor-training and peer-mentoring interventions for these scholars would enrich the perceived quality and breadth of discussions between mentor–protégé dyads (i.e., mentor–protégé pairs). Our multicenter, randomized study of 150 underrepresented scholar–mentor dyads compared: 1) mentor training, 2) protégé peer mentoring, 3) combined mentor training and peer mentoring, and 4) a control condition (i.e., usual practice of mentoring). In this secondary analysis, the outcome variables were quality of dyad time and breadth of their discussions. Protégé participants were graduate students, fellows, and junior faculty in behavioral and biomedical research and healthcare. Dyads with mentor training were more likely than those without mentor training to have discussed teaching and work–life balance. Dyads with peer mentoring were more likely than those without peer mentoring to have discussed clinical care and career plans. The combined intervention dyads were more likely than controls to perceive that the quality of their time together was good/excellent. Our study supports the value of these mentoring interventions to enhance the breadth of dyad discussions and quality of time together, both important components of a good mentoring relationship.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
2.5
作者：
Baard, PP;Deci, EL;Ryan, RM
通讯作者：
Ryan, RM
DOI：
10.1097/acm.0b013e3181cccd12
发表时间：
2010-03
期刊：
Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges
影响因子：
--
作者：
Johnson MO;Subak LL;Brown JS;Lee KA;Feldman MD
通讯作者：
Feldman MD
影响因子：
7.4
作者：
Kashiwagi, Deanne T.;Varkey, Prathibha;Cook, David A.
通讯作者：
Cook, David A.
影响因子：
2.7
作者：
CAREY, V;ZEGER, SL;DIGGLE, P
通讯作者：
DIGGLE, P
DOI：
10.1111/j.1752-8062.2011.00366.x
发表时间：
2012-06
期刊：
Clinical and translational science
影响因子：
--
作者：
Abedin Z;Biskup E;Silet K;Garbutt JM;Kroenke K;Feldman MD;McGee R Jr;Fleming M;Pincus HA
通讯作者：
Pincus HA