Knowledge Activation Versus Sentence Mapping when Representing Fictional Characters' Emotional States.

Knowledge Activation Versus Sentence Mapping when Representing Fictional Characters' Emotional States.
复制标题

代表虚构人物情绪状态时的知识激活与句子映射。

DOI:
10.1080/01690969208409391
复制
发表时间:
1992
期刊:
Language and cognitive processes
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Robertson,RachelRW
Robertson,RachelRW
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
Gernsbacher,MortonAnn;Robertson,RachelRW

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

我们研究了知识激活和句子映射在读者如何表征小说人物的情感状态中所起的作用。受试者阅读描述具体行动的故事,例如一个主角从他最好的朋友工作的商店偷钱,后来得知他的朋友被解雇了。通过操纵故事的内容(即写暗示不同情绪状态的故事),我们影响了哪些情绪知识会被激活。在每个故事之后,受试者阅读一个包含情感词的目标句子。通过操纵每个目标句子中的情感词(即它是否与故事所暗示的情感状态相匹配),我们影响了受试者将目标句子映射到他们正在发展的心理结构上的容易程度。在实验1中,我们进一步分离的作用,知识激活的句子映射的作用与密度操纵。当受试者阅读许多情感故事时,他们更广泛地激活了他们的情感状态知识。在实验2中使用比例操纵,我们证明了这一结果不是由于受试者的策略。
We investigated the role that knowledge activation and sentence mapping play in how readers represent fictional characters' emotional states. The subjects read stories that described concrete actions, such as a main character stealing money from a store where his best friend worked and later learning that his friend had been fired. By manipulating the content of the stories (i.e. writing stories that implied different emotional states), we affected what emotional knowledge would be activated. Following each story, the subjects read a target sentence that contained an emotion word. By manipulating the emotion word in each target sentence (i.e. whether it matchedvsmismatched the emotional state implied by the story), we affected how easily subjects could map the target sentence onto their developing mental structures. In Experiment 1, we further isolated the role of knowledge activation from the role of sentence mapping with a density manipulation. When the subjects read many emotional stories, they more widely activated their knowledge of emotional states. Using a proportionality manipulation in Experiment 2, we demonstrated that this result was not due to the subjects' strategies.
期望在句子整合中的作用。
DOI: --
发表时间: 1986
期刊: Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory and Cognition
影响因子: --
作者:
S. Duffy
通讯作者: S. Duffy
DOI: --
发表时间: 1990
期刊: Memory & Cognition
影响因子: 2.4
作者:
Margery M. Lucas;M. Tanenhaus;G. Carlson
通讯作者: G. Carlson
DOI: 10.1037/h0031564
发表时间: 1971-01-01
影响因子: --
作者:
MEYER, DE;SCHVANEVELDT, RW
通讯作者: SCHVANEVELDT, RW
DOI: 10.1016/0749-596x(88)90064-2
发表时间: 1988
影响因子: 4.3
作者:
G. R. Potts;J. Keenan;J. Golding
通讯作者: J. Golding
DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.11.1.28
发表时间: 1985-01-01
影响因子: 2.1
作者:
SIMPSON, GB;BURGESS, C
通讯作者: BURGESS, C