Gram positive and Gram negative bacteria differ in their sensitivity to cold plasma.
Gram positive and Gram negative bacteria differ in their sensitivity to cold plasma.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1038/srep38610
复制
发表时间:
2016-12-09
影响因子:
4.6
通讯作者:
Murphy AB
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Mai-Prochnow A;Clauson M;Hong J;Murphy AB
Cold atmospheric-pressure plasma (CAP) is a relatively new method being investigated for antimicrobial activity. However, the exact mode of action is still being explored. Here we report that CAP efficacy is directly correlated to bacterial cell wall thickness in several species. Biofilms of Gram positive Bacillus subtilis, possessing a 55.4 nm cell wall, showed the highest resistance to CAP, with less than one log10 reduction after 10 min treatment. In contrast, biofilms of Gram negative Pseudomonas aeruginosa, possessing only a 2.4 nm cell wall, were almost completely eradicated using the same treatment conditions. Planktonic cultures of Gram negative Pseudomonas libanensis also had a higher log10 reduction than Gram positive Staphylococcus epidermidis. Mixed species biofilms of P. aeruginosa and S. epidermidis showed a similar trend of Gram positive bacteria being more resistant to CAP treatment. However, when grown in co-culture, Gram negative P. aeruginosa was more resistant to CAP overall than as a mono-species biofilm. Emission spectra indicated OH and O, capable of structural cell wall bond breakage, were present in the plasma. This study indicates that cell wall thickness correlates with CAP inactivation times of bacteria, but cell membranes and biofilm matrix are also likely to play a role.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
3.7
作者:
Conibear TC;Collins SL;Webb JS
通讯作者:
Webb JS
影响因子:
2.2
作者:
Chen, CY;Nace, GW;Irwin, PL
通讯作者:
Irwin, PL
影响因子:
2.7
作者:
Allison, DG
通讯作者:
Allison, DG
影响因子:
3.7
作者:
Delben JA;Zago CE;Tyhovych N;Duarte S;Vergani CE
通讯作者:
Vergani CE
DOI:
10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2015.02.026
发表时间:
2015-07-01
影响因子:
10.8
作者:
Flynn, Padrig B.;Higginbotham, Sarah;Gilmore, Brendan F.
通讯作者:
Gilmore, Brendan F.