The response-window regression method—Some problematic assumptions: Comment on Draine and Greenwald (1998).
The response-window regression method—Some problematic assumptions: Comment on Draine and Greenwald (1998).
复制标题
响应窗口回归方法——一些有问题的假设：对 Draine 和 Greenwald (1998) 的评论。
DOI：
10.1037/0096-3445.127.3.311
复制
发表时间：
1998
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
B. Dosher
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
B. Dosher
本文提出了一种新的评价无意识语义启动的响应窗口回归方法（S. C. Draine & A. G. Greenwald, 1998），讨论了该方法的四个假设：(A)标准（普通最小二乘）回归的假设；(b)采用可比较的直接和间接措施的假设；(c)线性关系假设；(d)强迫反应的假设。在间接任务和直接任务测量之间的数据中具有强关系的情况，加上非标准回归技术，为该方法提供了最有力的证据。在间接任务和直接任务测量在数据中显示基本上没有关系的情况下，需要严密的理性论证和仔细的统计处理。Draine和Greenwald（1998）继Greenwald及其同事（Greenwald & Draine, 1997; Greenwald, Draine, & Abrams, 1996; Greenwald, Klinger, & Schuh, 1995）之前的工作之后，提出了一种有趣的新方法来证明无意识语义启动。该方法结合了用于最大化语义启动效应大小的响应窗口程序和用于评估“无意识”启动强度的回归方法。如果做得仔细，这种方法可能为无意识启动提供证据。本文重点介绍了回归法和响应窗口法应用中的一些问题，并提供了一些强解释的指导方针。考虑并讨论了该方法的以下假设：(a)标准回归假设；(b)采用可比较的直接和间接措施的假设；(c)线性关系假设；(d)强迫反应的假设。
A new response-window regression method for evaluating unconscious semantic priming (S. C. Draine & A. G. Greenwald, 1998) is consideredFour assumptions of the method are discussed: (a) the assumption of standard (ordinary least squares) regression; (b) the assumption of comparable direct and indirect measures; (c) the assumption of linear relationship; and (d) the assumption of forced responding. Situations with strong relationships in the data between indirect- and direct-task measures, coupled with nonstandard regression techniques, provide the strongest evidence from this method. Situations in which the indirect- and direct-task measures show essentially no relationship in the data demand closely reasoned arguments and careful statistical treatment. Draine and Greenwald (1998), following prior work by Greenwald and colleagues (Greenwald & Draine, 1997; Greenwald, Draine, & Abrams, 1996; Greenwald, Klinger, & Schuh, 1995), have proposed an intriguing new method for demonstrating unconscious semantic priming. The method combines a response-window procedure for maximizing the size of semantic-priming effects with a regression method for evaluating the strength of "unconscious" priming. When done carefully, this methodological approach may provide evidence for unconscious priming. This article highlights certain issues in the application of the regression method and the response-window method and offers several guidelines for strong interpretation. The following assumptions of the method are considered and discussed: (a) the assumption of standard regression; (b) the assumption of comparable direct and indirect measures; (c) the assumption of linear relation- ship; and (d) the assumption of forced responding.
登录
查看更多内容
纠正检测无意识认知中的测量误差：对 Draine 和 Greenwald (1998) 的评论
DOI：
10.1037//0096-3445.127.3.318
发表时间：
1998
期刊：
Journal of experimental psychology. General.
影响因子：
--
作者：
Klauer,KC;Greenwald,AG;Draine,SC
通讯作者：
Draine,SC
区分无意识与有意识认知——合理的假设和可复制的发现：对 Merikle 和 Reingold (1998) 以及 Dosher (1998) 的答复
DOI：
10.1037//0096-3445.127.3.320
发表时间：
1998
期刊：
Journal of experimental psychology. General.
影响因子：
--
作者：
Greenwald,AG;Draine,SC
通讯作者：
Draine,SC
由边缘可感知（“潜意识”）刺激激活：无意识与有意识认知的分离。
DOI：
10.1037//0096-3445.124.1.22
发表时间：
1995
期刊：
Journal of experimental psychology. General.
影响因子：
--
作者：
Greenwald,AG;Klinger,MR;Schuh,ES
通讯作者：
Schuh,ES
影响因子：
4.1
作者：
Draine, SC;Greenwald, AG
通讯作者：
Greenwald, AG