A comparison of direct versus self-report measures for assessing physical activity in adults: a systematic review.
A comparison of direct versus self-report measures for assessing physical activity in adults: a systematic review.
复制标题
直接与自我报告措施评估成人体育锻炼的比较：系统评价。
DOI：
10.1186/1479-5868-5-56
复制
发表时间：
2008-11-06
影响因子：
8.7
通讯作者：
Tremblay, Mark
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Prince, Stephanie A.;Adamo, Kristi B.;Hamel, Meghan E.;Hardt, Jill;Gorber, Sarah Connor;Tremblay, Mark
需要准确的评估来评估当前和变化的身体活动水平，并评估旨在提高活动水平的干预措施的有效性。本研究系统地回顾了文献，以确定主观（自我报告，例如问卷调查，日记）和客观（直接测量;例如加速度计，双标记水）评估成人体力活动之间的一致程度。检索了8个电子数据库，以确定成人人群的观察性和实验性研究。检索识别出4，463篇潜在文献。初步筛选发现，293人检查了自我报告和直接测量的身体活动之间的关系，并符合资格标准。完成了187篇文章的数据提取，其中描述了可比数据和/或比较，而76篇文章缺乏可比数据或比较，另有30篇文章不符合审查的资格要求。对从中提取数据的所有文章进行偏倚风险评估。自我报告和直接测量之间的相关性一般为低至中度，范围为-0.71至0.96。自我报告和直接测量身体活动之间的平均差异没有出现明确的模式。趋势因所采用的体力活动、所测量的体力活动水平和参与者的性别而异。偏倚风险评估结果表明，38%的研究质量评分较低。研究结果表明，测量方法可能会对观察到的身体活动水平产生重大影响。身体活动的自我报告措施都高于和低于直接测量的身体活动水平，这就带来了一个问题，既依赖于自我报告的措施，并试图纠正自我报告的直接措施的差异。这篇综述揭示了需要有效的，准确的和可靠的身体活动的措施，以评估当前和不断变化的身体活动水平，身体活动干预措施，以及身体活动和健康结果之间的关系。
Accurate assessment is required to assess current and changing physical activity levels, and to evaluate the effectiveness of interventions designed to increase activity levels. This study systematically reviewed the literature to determine the extent of agreement between subjectively (self-report e.g. questionnaire, diary) and objectively (directly measured; e.g. accelerometry, doubly labeled water) assessed physical activity in adults. Eight electronic databases were searched to identify observational and experimental studies of adult populations. Searching identified 4,463 potential articles. Initial screening found that 293 examined the relationship between self-reported and directly measured physical activity and met the eligibility criteria. Data abstraction was completed for 187 articles, which described comparable data and/or comparisons, while 76 articles lacked comparable data or comparisons, and a further 30 did not meet the review's eligibility requirements. A risk of bias assessment was conducted for all articles from which data was abstracted. Correlations between self-report and direct measures were generally low-to-moderate and ranged from -0.71 to 0.96. No clear pattern emerged for the mean differences between self-report and direct measures of physical activity. Trends differed by measure of physical activity employed, level of physical activity measured, and the gender of participants. Results of the risk of bias assessment indicated that 38% of the studies had lower quality scores. The findings suggest that the measurement method may have a significant impact on the observed levels of physical activity. Self-report measures of physical activity were both higher and lower than directly measured levels of physical activity, which poses a problem for both reliance on self-report measures and for attempts to correct for self-report – direct measure differences. This review reveals the need for valid, accurate and reliable measures of physical activity in evaluating current and changing physical activity levels, physical activity interventions, and the relationships between physical activity and health outcomes.
登录
查看更多内容
DOI：
10.1249/01.mss.0000106184.71258.32
发表时间：
2004-01-01
影响因子：
4.1
作者：
Bassett, DR;Schneider, PL;Huntington, GE
通讯作者：
Huntington, GE
DOI：
10.1002/j.1550-8528.1999.tb00387.x
发表时间：
1999-01-01
期刊：
OBESITY RESEARCH
影响因子：
--
作者：
Buchowski, MS;Townsend, KM;Sun, M
通讯作者：
Sun, M
影响因子：
5
作者：
BLAIR, SN;HASKELL, WL;WOOD, PD
通讯作者：
WOOD, PD
DOI：
10.1097/00005768-200007000-00022
发表时间：
2000-07-01
期刊：
MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE
影响因子：
--
作者：
Ainsworth, BE;Sternfeld, B;Jackson, K
通讯作者：
Jackson, K
DOI：
10.1046/j.1532-5415.2001.49006.x
发表时间：
2001-01-01
影响因子：
6.3
作者：
Bonnefoy, M;Normand, S;Kostka, T
通讯作者：
Kostka, T