Cohort Profile: Real-Time Insights of COVID-19 in India (RTI COVID-India).

Cohort Profile: Real-Time Insights of COVID-19 in India (RTI COVID-India).
复制标题

DOI:
10.1186/s12889-023-15084-1
复制
发表时间:
2023-02-09
期刊:
影响因子:
4.5
通讯作者:
--
中科院分区:
医学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

新型冠状病毒病(COVID)疫情在全球造成混乱,尤其令印度等中低收入国家感到痛苦。该研究旨在提供印度COVID相关结果随时间推移的人口代表性估计,并描述COVID相关变化和影响如何在整个生命过程中因关键社会经济群体而异。该样本来自印度现有的关于认知和痴呆症的全国代表性研究:印度纵向老龄化研究痴呆症统一诊断评估(LASI-DAD)。LASI-DAD的第一波招募了来自印度18个州和联邦直辖区的3316个家庭的4096名60岁及以上的老年人。在3316个LASI-DAD家庭中,有2704个拥有有效电话号码,并被邀请参加印度实时洞察COVID-19(RTI COVID-India)研究。RTI COVID-印度是一项每两个月进行一次的电话调查,旨在深入了解个人对COVID-19的知识、态度和行为,以及在整个大流行期间家庭经济和健康状况的变化。该调查于2020年5月开始,已收集了9轮数据。在拥有有效电话号码的2704个LASI-DAD家庭中,有1766个家庭至少参加了一次RTI COVID-印度调查。参与者年龄在18-102岁之间,49%为女性,66%居住在农村地区。在所有调查中,60-69岁的受访者中感染率较高。与农村地区(9.8%)相比,城市(23.0%)报告的COVID-19诊断患病率更高。接受过高等教育的受访者的COVID-19诊断患病率高于接受过较低或未接受过正规教育的受访者。与中等和低经济地位家庭相比,高经济地位家庭报告的COVID-19诊断患病率最高。比较经历COVID-19症状和被诊断的教育梯度,我们观察到相反的模式:没有受过正规教育的受访者报告经历COVID-19症状的最高水平,而受过中学或高等教育的受访者报告被诊断为COVID-19的比例最高。研究小组将分析收集到的数据,显示整个大流行期间的实时变化,并将广泛提供数据,供研究人员进行进一步研究。在线版本包含补充材料,可通过10.1186/s12889-023-15084-1获得。
The coronavirus disease (COVID) pandemic caused disruption globally and was particularly distressing in low- and middle-income countries such as India. This study aimed to provide population representative estimates of COVID-related outcomes in India over time and characterize how COVID-related changes and impacts differ by key socioeconomic groups across the life course. The sample was leveraged from an existing nationally representative study on cognition and dementia in India: Harmonized Diagnostic Assessment of Dementia for the Longitudinal Aging Study in India (LASI-DAD). The wave-1 of LASI-DAD enrolled 4096 older adults aged 60 years and older in 3316 households from 18 states and union territories of India. Out of the 3316 LASI-DAD households, 2704 with valid phone numbers were contacted and invited to participate in the Real-Time Insights COVID-19 in India (RTI COVID-India) study. RTI COVID-India was a bi-monthly phone survey that provided insight into the individual’s knowledge, attitudes, and behaviour towards COVID-19 and changes in the household’s economic and health conditions throughout the pandemic. The survey was started in May 2020 and 9 rounds of data have been collected. Out of the 2704 LASI-DAD households with valid phone numbers, 1766 households participated in the RTI COVID-India survey at least once. Participants were in the age range of 18–102 years, 49% were female, 66% resided in rural area. Across all rounds, there was a higher report of infection among respondents aged 60–69 years. There was a greater prevalence of COVID-19 diagnosis reported in urban (23.0%) compared to rural areas (9.8%). Respondents with higher education had a greater prevalence of COVID-19 diagnosis compared to those with lower or no formal education. Highest prevalence of COVID-19 diagnosis was reported from high economic status compared to middle and low economic status households. Comparing education gradients in experiencing COVID-19 symptoms and being diagnosed, we observe an opposite pattern: respondents with no formal schooling reported the highest level of experiencing COVID-19 symptoms, whereas the greatest proportion of the respondents with secondary school or higher education reported being diagnosed with COVID-19. The study group will analyse the data collected showing the real-time changes throughout the pandemic and will make the data widely available for researchers to conduct further studies. The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-023-15084-1.
DOI: 10.1002/gps.930100505
发表时间: 1995-05-01
影响因子: 4
作者:
GANGULI, M;RATCLIFF, G;DEKOSKY, S
通讯作者: DEKOSKY, S
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2021.102153
发表时间: 2021-12
期刊: Food policy
影响因子: 6.5
作者:
Zezza A;Martuscelli A;Wollburg P;Gourlay S;Kilic T
通讯作者: Kilic T
DOI: 10.1177/014662167700100306
发表时间: 1977-01-01
影响因子: 1.2
作者:
RADLOFF L S
通讯作者: RADLOFF L S
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058065
发表时间: 2022-02-01
期刊: BMJ open
影响因子: 2.9
作者:
Schaner S;Theys N;Angrisani M;Banerjee J;Khobragade PY;Petrosyan S;Agarwal A;Chien S;Weerman B;Chakrawarty A;Chatterjee P;Madaan N;Bloom D;Lee J;Dey AB
通讯作者: Dey AB
DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-004917
发表时间: 2021-07
期刊: BMJ global health
影响因子: 8.1
作者:
Menon S;Sonderegger P;Totapally S
通讯作者: Totapally S