Of organ meats and hepatitis E virus: one part of a larger puzzle is solved.
Of organ meats and hepatitis E virus: one part of a larger puzzle is solved.
复制标题
关于器官肉和戊型肝炎病毒:更大难题的一部分得到了解决。
DOI:
10.1086/593212
复制
发表时间:
2008
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Nelson,KenradE
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Kuniholm,MarkH;Nelson,KenradE
Hepatitis E virus (HEV) was first hypothesized to exist in 1980 after serologic tests for hepatitis A and hepatitis B viruses failed to implicate either pathogen as the cause of epidemics of water-borne hepatitis in India [1, 2]. Subsequent research has shown that HEV is the etiologic agent responsible for large epidemics of waterborne hepatitis and for a substantial fraction of sporadic (nonepidemic) hepatitis in developing countries [3, 4]. HEV is often noted for several unique epidemiologic characteristics. First, HEV causes clinical hepatitis most commonly in young and middle-aged adults; immunity to many other enteric pathogens, such as hepatitis A virus, is established early in life, and adults in settings of endemicity are rarely affected. Second, HEV infection appears to cause more-severe disease among pregnant women. Despite some preliminary hypotheses [5], the pathogenesis of this increased morbidity and mortality among pregnant women remains poorly understood. Finally, the environmental exposures associated with cases of hepatitis E are often observed to differ in developing versus industrialized countries. In industrialized countries, HEV is occasionally implicated as the cause of sporadic acute hepatitis. Some of these cases can be traced to travel to developing countries, but others have occurred among individuals reporting no foreign travel or contact with travelers [6–10]. Early investigations into the risk factors for autochthonous hepatitis E in industrialized countries provided few clues [9, 10]; however, a major advance in understanding occurred in the mid-1990s following detection of anti-HEV antibodies and HEV RNA in swine [11, 12]. These findings suggested that swine might be a natural reservoir for HEV and that the virus might be transmitted to humans in industrialized countries via exposure to swine or other animals. Curiously, the viruses detected in swine were significantly different from those generally detected in humans in developing countries (HEV genotypes 1 and 2) and, alongside strains derived from humans with autochthonous cases of hepatitis E in industrialized countries, have been assigned to different genotypes (HEV genotypes 3 and 4). Whereas swine are now thought to be a zoonotic reservoir for HEV genotypes 3 and 4, it has been reported that they are resistant to experimental challenge with HEV genotypes 1 and 2 [13], the principal causes of water-borne hepatitis E in developing countries.In this issue of the Journal, Wichmann et al.[14] describe the results of a casecontrol study of risk factors for autochthonous hepatitis E in Germany, a country in which hepatitis E is reportable. Among the cases reported over a 16-month period, they found 45 persons (68%) with autochthonous hepatitis E and 21 (32%) with travel-related hepatitis E. Consistent with previous studies from Europe, they found that the majority of the genotyped autochthonous cases (14 of 15) stemmed from infection with genotype 3 viruses [15, 16], whereas the majority of travel-associated cases (8 of 9) were due to genotype 1 infections. They also note, for the first time to our knowledge, a case of autochthonous hepatitis E in Europe caused by HEV genotype 4, a strain primarily recovered from swine and persons with autochthonous cases in Asia. They found that the odds of recent consumption of wild-boar meat (odds ratio, 4.3; 95% confidence interval, 1.2–15.6) and/or offal (odds ratio, 2.7; 95% confidence interval, 1.2–6.2) were higher among persons with autochthonous hepatitis E than among matched control subjects. In response to these findings, they suggest specific preventive measures aimed at improving public health. The study by Wichmann …
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
11.8
作者:
Marc;W. M. Jaspers;W. V. D. van der Poel;F. Verschoor;A. M. de Roda Husman;H. Winter;H. Zaaijer;M. Koopmans
通讯作者:
M. Koopmans
影响因子:
11.8
作者:
Thomas Tsang;Edward K. Denison;Howard V. Williams;Linda Venczel;Michele M. Ginsberg;D. Vugia
通讯作者:
D. Vugia
DOI:
10.4269/ajtmh.1999.61.331
发表时间:
1999-08-01
影响因子:
3.3
作者:
Kabrane-Lazizi, Y;Fine, JB;Purcell, RH
通讯作者:
Purcell, RH
影响因子:
6.4
作者:
Emerson, SU;Arankalle, VA;Purcell, RH
通讯作者:
Purcell, RH