The effective population size of malaria mosquitoes: large impact of vector control.
The effective population size of malaria mosquitoes: large impact of vector control.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pgen.1003097
复制
发表时间:
2012
期刊:
影响因子:
4.5
通讯作者:
Slotman MA
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Athrey G;Hodges TK;Reddy MR;Overgaard HJ;Matias A;Ridl FC;Kleinschmidt I;Caccone A;Slotman MA
Malaria vectors in sub-Saharan Africa have proven themselves very difficult adversaries in the global struggle against malaria. Decades of anti-vector interventions have yielded mixed results—with successful reductions in transmission in some areas and limited impacts in others. These varying successes can be ascribed to a lack of universally effective vector control tools, as well as the development of insecticide resistance in mosquito populations. Understanding the impact of vector control on mosquito populations is crucial for planning new interventions and evaluating existing ones. However, estimates of population size changes in response to control efforts are often inaccurate because of limitations and biases in collection methods. Attempts to evaluate the impact of vector control on mosquito effective population size (Ne) have produced inconclusive results thus far. Therefore, we obtained data for 13–15 microsatellite markers for more than 1,500 mosquitoes representing multiple time points for seven populations of three important vector species—Anopheles gambiae, An. melas, and An. moucheti—in Equatorial Guinea. These populations were exposed to indoor residual spraying or long-lasting insecticidal nets in recent years. For comparison, we also analyzed data from two populations that have no history of organized vector control. We used Approximate Bayesian Computation to reconstruct their demographic history, allowing us to evaluate the impact of these interventions on the effective population size. In six of the seven study populations, vector control had a dramatic impact on the effective population size, reducing Ne between 55%–87%, the exception being a single An. melas population. In contrast, the two negative control populations did not experience a reduction in effective population size. This study is the first to conclusively link anti-vector intervention programs in Africa to sharply reduced effective population sizes of malaria vectors. The battle against malaria mosquitoes in sub-Saharan Africa is being fought with two main weapons: indoor residual spraying of insecticides (IRS) and long-lasting insecticidal net (LLIN) campaigns. Although many programs have been successful in reducing malaria infection, demonstrating the impact of these programs on vector populations is typically confounded by numerous variables associated with collection methods. Here, we analyzed more than 1,500 samples of three important malaria vectors—Anopheles gambiae, An. melas, and An. moucheti—from seven sites in Equatorial Guinea that were collected over the course of anti-vector programs in that country (2004–2010). Taking advantage of recently developed coalescent genetic approaches, we derived the demographic history, estimated the effective population size, and determined the timings of population size changes. We demonstrate convincingly for the first time that both IRS– and LLIN–based control resulted in lowered effective population sizes in most cases. No such reductions were observed in negative control populations. Our findings are especially important to malaria control because estimating population sizes using conventional trapping approaches is often limited by our ability to obtain representative samples. More importantly, we were able to conclusively link anti-vector interventions to genetic impacts, a linkage that has been difficult to establish in the past.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
5.8
作者:
Cornuet, Jean-Marie;Santos, Filipe;Beaumont, Mark A.;Robert, Christian P.;Marin, Jean-Michel;Balding, David J.;Guillemaud, Thomas;Estoup, Arnaud
通讯作者:
Estoup, Arnaud
影响因子:
4.9
作者:
Deitz KC;Athrey G;Reddy MR;Overgaard HJ;Matias A;Jawara M;Della Torre A;Petrarca V;Pinto J;Kiszewski AE;Kengne P;Costantini C;Caccone A;Slotman MA
通讯作者:
Slotman MA
影响因子:
3
作者:
Cornuet JM;Ravigné V;Estoup A
通讯作者:
Estoup A
影响因子:
7.7
作者:
Estoup, Arnaud;Baird, Stuart J. E.;Excoffier, Laurent
通讯作者:
Excoffier, Laurent
影响因子:
3
作者:
Bayoh MN;Mathias DK;Odiere MR;Mutuku FM;Kamau L;Gimnig JE;Vulule JM;Hawley WA;Hamel MJ;Walker ED
通讯作者:
Walker ED