Comparing the Reliability and Validity of Global Self-Report Measures of Subjective Well-Being With Experiential Day Reconstruction Measures.
Comparing the Reliability and Validity of Global Self-Report Measures of Subjective Well-Being With Experiential Day Reconstruction Measures.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1177/1073191117744660
复制
发表时间：
2020-01
期刊：
影响因子：
3.8
通讯作者：
Donnellan MB
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Hudson NW;Anusic I;Lucas RE;Donnellan MB
全球福祉的自我报告指标被认为反映了人们生活的整体质量。然而，一些学者认为，人们在报告他们的全球福祉时依赖启发法，例如当前情绪。体验式幸福感测量，例如日重建法（DRM），已被提议作为一种替代技术，以获得可能更准确的幸福感评估。在两项多方法、短期纵向研究中，我们比较了全球自我报告和基于 DRM 的简短幸福感评估的心理测量特性。我们评估了它们在一个月内的稳定性，使用自我告知协议测试了它们的收敛有效性，并评估了与人格特质的相关性。结果表明，全球福祉衡量标准比基于 DRM 的体验衡量标准更加稳定。自我知情同意在全球措施和 DRM 措施中也相同，或者在全球措施中更高。各种方法与个性的相关性相似。这些发现表明，当 DRM 和全球幸福感衡量标准用于对一个人的典型主观幸福感水平进行总体评估时，具有相似的心理测量特性。
Self-report measures of global well-being are thought to reflect the overall quality of people’s lives. However, several scholars have argued that people rely on heuristics, such as current mood, when reporting their global well-being. Experiential well-being measures, such as the day reconstruction method (DRM), have been proposed as an alternative technique to obtain a potentially more accurate assessment of well-being. Across two multi-method, short-term longitudinal studies, we compared the psychometric properties of global self-reports and short-form DRM-based assessments of well-being. We evaluated their stability across one month, tested their convergent validity using self-informant agreement, and evaluated correlations with personality traits. Results indicated that global measures of well-being were more stable than DRM-based experiential measures. Self-informant agreement was also either equal across global and DRM measures or higher for global measures. Correlations with personality were similar across approaches. These findings suggest that DRM and global measures of well-being have similar psychometric properties when used to provide an overall assessment of a person’s typical level of subjective well-being.
登录
查看更多内容
DOI：
10.1080/10705519909540118
发表时间：
1999-01-01
影响因子：
6
作者：
Hu, Li-tze;Bentler, Peter M.
通讯作者：
Bentler, Peter M.
影响因子：
16.4
作者：
GOLDBERG, LR
通讯作者：
GOLDBERG, LR
影响因子：
7.6
作者：
Anusic, Ivana;Schimmack, Ulrich
通讯作者：
Schimmack, Ulrich
影响因子：
3.1
作者：
Eid, M;Diener, E
通讯作者：
Diener, E
影响因子：
3.3
作者：
Bylsma, Lauren M.;Croon, Marcel A.;Rottenberg, Jonathan
通讯作者：
Rottenberg, Jonathan