Who performs better? A comparative analysis of problem-solving effectiveness and legitimacy attributions to international organizations
Who performs better? A comparative analysis of problem-solving effectiveness and legitimacy attributions to international organizations
复制标题
谁表现更好？
DOI：
10.1177/00108367211036916
复制
发表时间：
--
影响因子：
2
通讯作者：
Franziska Hohlstein
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Diana Panke;Gurur Polat;Franziska Hohlstein
单个国际组织的绩效受到了相当多的学术关注，这并不是因为它们对全球治理的重要性。本文通过采用真正的比较镜头来补充这一工作。基于一项新的调查，它评估了49个国际组织的归因性能在两个重要方面：解决问题的有效性和合法性的产出。这揭示了两个组件的IO之间的差异。我们从国际合作和IO设计中得出假设。定量分析表明，除了协商性外交实践外，提高归因合法性的因素与提高归因问题解决有效性的因素存在差异。最值得注意的是，自治的秘书处提高了国际组织解决问题的效率。当国际组织是区域性的，而不是全球性的，当非国家行为者有机会进入IO决策的合法性属性增加。
The performance of individual international organizations (IOs) has received considerable scholarly attention, not in the least because their importance for global governance. This paper adds to this body of work by adopting genuine comparative lenses. Based on a novel survey, it assesses the attributed performance of 49 IOs over two important dimensions: problem-solving effectiveness and legitimacy of outputs. This reveals variation between IOs with respect to both components. We derive hypotheses from international cooperation and IO design. The quantitative analysis reveals that except deliberative diplomatic practices many factors increasing attributed legitimacy differ from the ones increasing the attributed problem-solving effectiveness. Most notably, autonomous secretariats increase the problem-solving effectiveness attributed to IOs. Legitimacy attributions increase when IOs are regional instead of global in nature and when non-state actors have access to IO decision-making.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
2.9
作者：
D. Panke
通讯作者：
D. Panke
DOI：
--
发表时间：
2005
期刊：
Philosophy, Politics, Democracy
影响因子：
--
作者：
Joshua Cohen
通讯作者：
Joshua Cohen
争论、讨价还价等等：国际关系中的交往行为、理性主义理论和适当性逻辑
影响因子：
3.4
作者：
Harald Müller
通讯作者：
Harald Müller
影响因子：
3.4
作者：
Diana Panke
通讯作者：
Diana Panke
欧盟谈判：讨价还价还是解决问题？
影响因子：
4.2
作者：
Ole Elgström;Christer Jönsson
通讯作者：
Christer Jönsson