Judgment Internalism: an Argument from Self-Knowledge

Judgment Internalism: an Argument from Self-Knowledge
复制标题

判断内在主义:来自自我认识的论证

DOI:
10.1007/s10677-018-9923-5
复制
发表时间:
2018
影响因子:
1
通讯作者:
Suikkanen J
Suikkanen J
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
Suikkanen J

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

最重要的元伦理学辩论之一涉及评价判断与动机之间的关系。所谓的判断内在主义者声称,我们的评价判断和动机之间存在着内在的模式联系,而所谓的外在主义者则认为,评价判断只能通过偶然的外部事实与欲望联系起来。这场争论已经陷入僵局。我的目的是为内在主义引入一种全新的论证,它不依赖于我们对个案的直觉。我认为,内在主义的真理最好地解释了为什么所谓的透明方法能够产生对我们想要的东西的自我了解。
One of the most important metaethical debates concerns the relationship between evaluative judgments and motivation. The so-called judgment internalists claim that there is an internal modal connection between our evaluative judgments and motivation, whereas the so-called externalists believe that evaluative judgments are connected to desires only through contingent external facts. This debate has reached a standoff. My aim is to introduce a completely new argument for internalism, which does not rely on our intuitions about individual cases. I argue that the truth of internalism explains best why the so-called transparency method yields self-knowledge of what we desire.
道德孪生地球的元伦理意义
DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198784647.003.0001
发表时间: 2016
期刊: Organic letters
影响因子: 5.2
作者:
J. Dowell
通讯作者: J. Dowell
道德问题
DOI: --
发表时间: 1994
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
Nicholas L. Sturgeon;M. Smith
通讯作者: M. Smith
动机内在主义
DOI: --
发表时间: 2008
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
Christian B. Miller
通讯作者: Christian B. Miller
DOI: 10.2307/2218611
发表时间: 1970
期刊: --
影响因子: --
作者:
T. Nagel
通讯作者: T. Nagel
DOI: --
发表时间: 2009
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
M. Boyle
通讯作者: M. Boyle