Quality of DNA extracted from mouthwashes.
Quality of DNA extracted from mouthwashes.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0006165
复制
发表时间:
2009-07-07
期刊:
影响因子:
3.7
通讯作者:
Guggenheim JA
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Zayats T;Young TL;Mackey DA;Malecaze F;Calvas P;Guggenheim JA
A cost effective, safe and efficient method of obtaining DNA samples is essential in large scale genetic analyses. Buccal cells are an attractive source of DNA, as their collection is non-invasive and can be carried out by mail. However, little attention has been given to the quality of DNA extracted from mouthwashes. Mouthwash-derived DNA was extracted from 500 subjects participating in a genetic study of high myopia. DNA quality was investigated using two standard techniques: agarose gel electrophoresis and quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR). Whereas the majority of mouthwash-derived DNA samples showed a single band of high molecular weight DNA by gel electrophoresis, 8.9% (95% CI: 7.1–10.7%) of samples contained only a smear of low-to-medium molecular weight, degraded DNA. The odds of DNA degradation in a subject's second mouthwash sample, given degradation of the first, was significantly greater than one (OR = 3.13; 95% CI: 1.22–7.39; Fisher's test P = 0.009), suggesting that DNA degradation was at least partially a subject-specific phenomenon. Approximately 12.4% (95% CI: 10.4–14.4%) of mouthwash-derived DNA failed to PCR amplify efficiently (using an ∼200 bp microsatellite marker). However, we found there was no significant difference in amplification success rate between DNA samples judged to be degraded or non-degraded by gel electrophoresis (Fisher's test P = 0.5). This study demonstrated that DNA degradation affects a significant minority of saline mouthwashes, and that the phenomenon is partially subject-specific. Whilst the level of degradation did not significantly prevent successful amplification of short PCR fragments, previous studies suggest that such DNA degradation would compromise more demanding applications.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
3.9
作者:
Bergen, AW;Haque, KA;Chanock, SJ
通讯作者:
Chanock, SJ
影响因子:
4.4
作者:
Farbrother, JE;Kirov, G;Guggenheim, JA
通讯作者:
Guggenheim, JA
影响因子:
2.6
作者:
Glei, M;Habermann, N;Pool-Zobel, BL
通讯作者:
Pool-Zobel, BL
影响因子:
3.3
作者:
König, KG
通讯作者:
König, KG
影响因子:
6.7
作者:
Haffajee, AD;Socransky, SS
通讯作者:
Socransky, SS