Rethinking Social Desirability Scales
Rethinking Social Desirability Scales
复制标题
重新思考社会期望量表
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2010
影响因子：
12.6
通讯作者：
L. Uziel
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
L. Uziel
社会期望（特别是印象管理）量表被研究人员和从业人员广泛使用，以筛选那些以自我偏爱的方式对自我报告产生偏见的人。这些量表还有助于确定有心理和健康问题风险的个人。本审查探讨的证据方面的能力，这些规模，以实现这些目标。在第一部分的审查，我提出了六个标准来评估印象管理量表，并得出结论，他们是不令人满意的反应风格的措施。接下来，我将探讨印象管理分数中的个体差异实际上是如何衡量的。我比较两种方法：一种是防御性方法，认为这些量表测量的防御性源于脆弱的自尊，另一种是调整方法，认为印象管理与个人福祉和人际关系调整有关。来自各种领域的数据，包括社会行为，情感和幸福，健康和工作表现往往有利于调整方法。最后，我认为，衡量印象管理的尺度应重新定义为人际导向的自我控制，识别个人谁表现出高水平的自我控制，特别是在社会背景下的措施。
Social desirability (specifically, impression management) scales are widely used by researchers and practitioners to screen individuals who bias self-reports in a self-favoring manner. These scales also serve to identify individuals at risk for psychological and health problems. The present review explores the evidence with regard to the ability of these scales to achieve these objectives. In the first part of the review, I present six criteria to evaluate impression management scales and conclude that they are unsatisfactory as measures of response style. Next, I explore what individual differences in impression management scores actually do measure. I compare two approaches: a defensiveness approach, which argues that these scales measure defensiveness that stems from vulnerable self-esteem, and an adjustment approach, which suggests that impression management is associated with personal well-being and interpersonal adjustment. Data from a wide variety of fields including social behavior, affect and well-being, health, and job performance tend to favor the adjustment approach. Finally, I argue that scales measuring impression management should be redefined as measures of interpersonally oriented self-control that identify individuals who demonstrate high levels of self-control, especially in social contexts.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
4.4
作者：
Carey, KB;Neal, DJ;Collins, SE
通讯作者：
Collins, SE
影响因子：
5
作者：
W. Graziano;R. M. Tobin
通讯作者：
W. Graziano;R. M. Tobin
阻遏物和非阻遏物的额叶激活。
影响因子：
4.6
作者：
Tomarken,AJ;Davidson,RJ
通讯作者：
Davidson,RJ
特征之间的差异：与法官间一致性相关的属性。
影响因子：
7.6
作者：
Funder,DC;Dobroth,KM
通讯作者：
Dobroth,KM
影响因子：
7.6
作者：
Cross, SE;Bacon, PL;Morris, ML
通讯作者：
Morris, ML