The Effects of Two Different Resisted Swim Training Load Protocols on Swimming Strength and Performance.
The Effects of Two Different Resisted Swim Training Load Protocols on Swimming Strength and Performance.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1515/hukin-2017-0194
复制
发表时间：
2018-09
影响因子：
2.3
通讯作者：
Arroyo-Toledo JJ
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
González Ravé JM;Legaz-Arrese A;González-Mohíno F;Yustres I;Barragán R;Fernández FA;Juárez D;Arroyo-Toledo JJ
本研究采用力量训练架，探讨两种不同的游泳负荷对抗方式对游泳力量和成绩的影响。16名男子、青年国家级游泳运动员（平均年龄16.22 ± 2.63岁，身高169 ± 10.20 cm，体重61.33 ± 9.90 kg）完成了为期6周的专项力量训练计划，然后被随机分配到两组中的一组：标准训练组（GS组，n = 8）和平板负荷训练组（GP组，n = 8）。力量和力量测试沿着与特定的游泳测试（50米爬行和50米竞赛式计时试验）进行了基线（前测试），第三周前（中期测试），和6周后的干预（后测试）。进行等速游泳台测试以获得力产生和功率的测量值，并且使用功率架系统进行1RM测试以测量最大阻力负荷（MDL）和比游泳功率。干预6周后，平均MDL增加了13.94%（p <0.05）。在GP中，50米比赛风格和50米爬行时间试验的得分分别提高了0.32%和0.78%;然而，这些变化在统计学上并不显著。50 m比赛时间增加2.59%，等速肌力下降14.47%（p <0.05）。6周的力量训练计划进行的权力机架设备在金字塔组织比标准的线性负荷组织更有效的MDL的生产方面的改善，但是，它并没有产生显着的改善性能。在准备阶段，可以推荐使用金字塔组织的力量训练计划用于年轻游泳运动员的特定力量训练。然而，在我们的研究中，该计划并没有产生显着的变化，在50米自由泳和主要竞争风格的表现。
This study used a power rack device to evaluate the effects of 2 different approaches to resisted swim training loads on swimming strength and performance. Sixteen male, youth national-level swimmers (mean age, 16.22 ± 2.63 years; body height, 169 ± 10.20 cm; body mass, 61.33 ± 9.90 kg) completed a 6-week specific strength-training program, and were then randomly assigned to one of the two groups: a standard training group (GS, n = 8) and a flat pyramid-loading pattern group (GP, n = 8). Strength and power tests along with specific swimming tests (50-m crawl and 50-m competition-style time trials) were conducted at baseline (pre-test), before the third week (mid-test), and after 6 weeks of intervention (post-test). Isokinetic swim bench tests were conducted to obtain measurements of force production and power, and 1RM tests with the power rack system were conducted to measure the maximum drag load (MDL) and specific swimming power. Following 6 weeks of intervention, the mean MDL increased (p < 0.05) by 13.94%. Scores for the 50-m competition style and 50-m crawl time trials improved by 0.32% and 0.78%, respectively, in the GP; however, those changes were not statistically significant. The GS significantly increased their time in the 50-m competition style by 2.59%, and their isokinetic force production decreased by 14.47% (p < 0.05). The 6-week strength-training program performed with the power rack device in a pyramidal organization was more effective than a standard linear load organization in terms of producing improvements in the MDL; however, it did not produce significant improvements in performance. The use of a strength-training program with a pyramidal organization can be recommended for specific strength-training in young swimmers during a preparatory period. However, in our study, that program did not produce significant changes in 50-m crawl and main competition style performance.
登录
查看更多内容
DOI：
10.1519/jsc.0b013e3182162f2b
发表时间：
2011-12-01
影响因子：
3.2
作者：
Rahimi, Rahman
通讯作者：
Rahimi, Rahman
影响因子：
3
作者：
Campos, GER;Luecke, TJ;Staron, RS
通讯作者：
Staron, RS
影响因子：
2.3
作者：
Morouço P;Neiva H;González-Badillo JJ;Garrido N;Marinho DA;Marques MC
通讯作者：
Marques MC
影响因子：
2.5
作者：
HAWLEY, JA;WILLIAMS, MM
通讯作者：
WILLIAMS, MM
影响因子：
1.4
作者：
Morouco, Pedro;Keskinen, Kari L.;Fernandes, Ricardo Jorge
通讯作者：
Fernandes, Ricardo Jorge