Contract designs for energy-saving product development in a monopoly

Contract designs for energy-saving product development in a monopoly
复制标题

垄断节能产品开发合同设计

DOI:
10.1016/j.ejor.2015.10.024
复制
发表时间:
2016-05
影响因子:
6.4
通讯作者:
W. Huang
W. Huang
中科院分区:
管理学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
周文慧;W. Huang

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

我们讨论了在有政府预算限制的垄断情况下节能产品的两种合同。这些合同规定了补贴,要么是固定金额(称为F型合同),要么是折扣(称为D型合同),以及产品能源消耗水平的门槛,低于这个门槛的产品被贴上认证产品的标签,并有资格获得补贴。建立了一个三阶段博弈模型,给出了两种不同的政府目标下的最优合同设计:总能耗最小和平均能耗最小。研究结果表明:1)在两个目标下,最优契约设计是相同的;2)当补贴预算相对较低时,F型契约比D型契约更可取,反之亦然;3)在政府补贴预算为零的情况下,F型契约的认证功能使政府能够利用消费者的环境意识来改善环境绩效;4)两种契约都有利于环境。在F型合同下,只有政府为环境改善买单。相比之下,在D型合同下,政府和消费者都要支付费用。
We discuss two types of contracts for energy-saving products in a monopoly with the government’s budget constraint. These contracts specify the subsidy, either a fixed amount (referred to as F-type contracts) or a discount (referred to as D-type contracts), and the threshold of the energy consumption level of products, below which the products are labeled as certified products and qualified for the subsidy. We model a three-stage game and give optimal design of the contracts under two different objectives of the government: minimizing the total energy consumption and minimizing the average energy consumption. Our results show that: 1) The optimal contract designs are the same under the two objectives; 2) If the subsidy budget is relatively low, the F-type contract is more preferable than the D-type contract, and vice versa; 3) The contracts’ function of certification enables the government to take the advantage of the consumer environmental awareness to improve the environmental performance even when the government’s subsidy budget is zero; 4) Both contracts benefit the environment. Under the F-type contract, only the government pays for the environmental improvement. In contrast, under the D-type contract, both the government and consumers pay.
DOI: 10.1111/j.1937-5956.2012.01327.x
发表时间: 2012-11-01
影响因子: 5
作者:
Atasu, Atalay;Subramanian, Ravi
通讯作者: Subramanian, Ravi
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2376662
发表时间: 2014-01
期刊: Diffusion of Innovation eJournal
影响因子: --
作者:
Maxime C. Cohen;R. Lobel;G. Perakis
通讯作者: Maxime C. Cohen;R. Lobel;G. Perakis
DOI: --
发表时间: 2012
期刊: --
影响因子: --
作者:
R. Lobel
通讯作者: R. Lobel
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2012.07.030
发表时间: 2012-12
期刊: Eur. J. Oper. Res.
影响因子: --
作者:
Christopher S. Tang;Sean X. Zhou
通讯作者: Christopher S. Tang;Sean X. Zhou
DOI: --
发表时间: 2011
期刊: --
影响因子: --
作者:
T. Taylor;Prashant Yadav
通讯作者: T. Taylor;Prashant Yadav