Eyewitness Identification: Live, Photo, and Video Lineups.
Eyewitness Identification: Live, Photo, and Video Lineups.
复制标题
目击者的身份：现场，照片和视频阵容。
DOI：
10.1037/law0000164
复制
发表时间：
2018-08
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Valentine T
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Fitzgerald RJ;Price HL;Valentine T
根据刑事调查地点的不同，用于呈现阵容成员以进行目击证人识别的媒介也有所不同。尽管在某些司法管辖区，现场阵容仍然是默认程序，但在其他地方，这种做法已被照片或视频阵容取代。这种分歧导致两种可能性：要么某些司法管辖区没有使用最有利于准确目击者识别的阵容媒体，要么阵容媒体与目击者识别的准确性无关。照片和视频阵容是更实用的选择，但现场阵容的支持者认为，当阵容成员亲自在场时，目击者可以做出更好的识别决定。在这里，作者反对这种生存优势假设。为了在实践中脱颖而出，现场演示的好处必须足够大，以克服组织和管理现场阵容的固有困难。对文献的回顾表明，即使在可以将这些困难最小化的实验环境中，也不清楚现场阵容是否优越。作者得出的结论是，直播阵容很少是实践中的最佳选择，并鼓励进一步研究以确定哪种非直播媒体可以在证明价值和实用性之间提供最佳平衡。
The medium used to present lineup members for eyewitness identification varies according to the location of the criminal investigation. Although in some jurisdictions live lineups remain the default procedure, elsewhere this practice has been replaced with photo or video lineups. This divergence leads to two possibilities: Either some jurisdictions are not using the lineup medium that best facilitates accurate eyewitness identification or the lineup medium has no bearing on the accuracy of eyewitness identification. Photo and video lineups are the more practical options, but proponents of live lineups believe witnesses make better identification decisions when the lineup members are physically present. Here, the authors argue against this live superiority hypothesis. To be superior in practice, the benefits of live presentation would have to be substantial enough to overcome the inherent difficulties of organizing and administering a live lineup. The review of the literature suggests that even in experimental settings, where these difficulties can be minimized, it is not clear that live lineups are superior. The authors conclude that live lineups are rarely the best option in practice and encourage further research to establish which nonlive medium provides the best balance between probative value and practical utility.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
9.9
作者：
CUTLER, BL;PENROD, SD;MARTENS, TK
通讯作者：
MARTENS, TK
影响因子：
1.7
作者：
Buratto, Luciano G.;Matthews, William J.;Lamberts, Koen
通讯作者：
Lamberts, Koen
DOI：
10.1016/j.jarmac.2013.06.003
发表时间：
2013-09-01
影响因子：
4.2
作者：
Clark, Steven E.;Brower, Gwendolyn L.;Moreland, Molly B.
通讯作者：
Moreland, Molly B.
影响因子：
9.9
作者：
CUTLER, BL;PENROD, SD
通讯作者：
PENROD, SD
影响因子：
12.6
作者：
Clark, Steven E.
通讯作者：
Clark, Steven E.