Electronic cigarette users' reactions and responses to a hypothetical ban of flavoured electronic cigarette liquids.
Electronic cigarette users' reactions and responses to a hypothetical ban of flavoured electronic cigarette liquids.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1136/tc-2022-057454
复制
发表时间：
2022-11
期刊：
影响因子：
5.2
通讯作者：
Fagan, Pebbles
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Soule, Eric K.;Mayne, Shannon;Snipes, William;Thomas, Luke;Guy, Mignonne C.;Breland, Alison;Fagan, Pebbles
已经提出了限制电子烟口味的法规，但对此类政策的潜在影响的研究有限。这项研究调查了成年电子烟用户对电子烟口味禁令的反应。2019年，美国现有电子烟用户的便利样本（n=81, 52.4%为女性，平均年龄=37.6,59.3%为双烟用户）完成了一项在线概念图研究。参与者提供了陈述，描述了对一项假设政策的预期反应，该政策只允许购买烟草、薄荷醇或无味电子烟。生成了71条唯一语句。参与者将陈述分为主题组，并根据每种反应的可能性对陈述进行评级。使用多维标度来识别主题类语句。确定了12个集群：负面反应，采取行动反对风味限制，青少年预防有效性感知，宽容，接受，愿意尝试新口味，保持吸电子烟，减少吸电子烟，新口味作为吸电子烟戒烟过渡，禁用香料的替代来源，自己做混合行为和替代烟草产品。评分最高的类别（负面反应）描述了对口味被禁止感到愤怒或不安，而评分最低的类别与戒烟/减少电子烟使用或转向其他烟草产品有关。非烟草或非薄荷/薄荷味电子烟用户在描述对假设政策的负面情绪的集群中获得了更高的评分。一些电子烟用户可能不喜欢电子烟口味禁令，然而，一些电子烟用户可能更愿意使用烟草、薄荷醇或无味的电子烟液体，而戒烟或转向其他烟草产品的可能性更低。
Regulations have been proposed to limit e-cigarette flavors, but limited research has examined potential impacts of such policies. This study examined adult e-cigarette users’ reactions to a hypothetical e-cigarette flavor ban. In 2019, a convenience sample of current e-cigarette users in the U.S. (n=81, 52.4% women, mean age=37.6, 59.3% dual users of cigarettes) completed an online concept mapping study. Participants provided statements describing anticipated reactions to a hypothetical policy in which only tobacco, menthol, or unflavored e-cigarettes were available for purchase. Seventy-one unique statements were generated. Participants sorted statements into thematic groups and rated statements on how likely they would be to have each reaction. Multidimensional scaling was used to identify thematic clusters of statements. Twelve clusters were identified: Negative Reaction, Take Action Against Flavor Limitation, Youth Prevention Effectiveness Perception, Tolerance, Acceptance, Willingness to Try New Flavors, Maintain Vaping, Reduce Vaping, New Flavors as Vaping Cessation Transition, Alternative Sources for Banned Flavors, Do-it-yourself Mixing Behaviors, and Alternative Tobacco Products. The highest rated cluster (Negative Reaction) described being angry or upset that flavors were banned, while the lowest rated clusters related to quitting/reducing e-cigarette use or switching to other tobacco products. Non-tobacco or non-menthol/mint flavored e-cigarette users had higher ratings for clusters describing negative sentiment for the hypothetical policy. Some e-cigarette users may dislike an e-cigarette flavor ban, however, some e-cigarette users would likely be willing to use tobacco, menthol, or unflavored e-cigarette liquids with lower likelihood of quitting vaping or switching to other tobacco products.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
4.2
作者：
Lanza HI;Leventhal AM;Cho J;Braymiller JL;Krueger EA;McConnell R;Barrington-Trimis JL
通讯作者：
Barrington-Trimis JL
影响因子：
1.9
作者：
Gupta PS;Kalagher KM
通讯作者：
Kalagher KM
影响因子：
5.2
作者：
Delnevo, Cristine;Giovenco, Daniel P.;Hrywna, Mary
通讯作者：
Hrywna, Mary
影响因子：
2.3
作者：
Hiler, Marzena;Karaoghlanian, Nareg;Talih, Soha;Maloney, Sarah;Breland, Alison;Shihadeh, Alan;Eissenberg, Thomas
通讯作者：
Eissenberg, Thomas
影响因子：
9.9
作者：
DENNIS, AR;VALACICH, JS
通讯作者：
VALACICH, JS