Clarifying the content coverage of differing psychopathy inventories through reference to the triarchic psychopathy measure.
Clarifying the content coverage of differing psychopathy inventories through reference to the triarchic psychopathy measure.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1037/a0035152
复制
发表时间：
2014-06
影响因子：
3.6
通讯作者：
Arsal G
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Drislane LE;Patrick CJ;Arsal G
精神病的三位一体模型被制定为调和精神病不同概念的综合框架。该模型的特点是精神病的三个可区分的表型成分：大胆，卑鄙，去抑制。从一个大的混合性别的本科生样本（N = 618）的数据被用来检查的关系，几个最著名的措施，用于评估精神病特征的得分的三重精神病测量（TriPM），开发的库存操作的三重模型，通过单独的方面规模。分析显示，建立的清单的精神病指数组件的模型所索引的TriPM不同程度。虽然每个库存提供了有效的覆盖面的卑鄙和去抑制组件，仪器不同，在他们的代表大胆。目前的结果证明了三元模型对于描绘精神病替代测量方法之间的共性和差异的启发性价值，并为三元模型作为协调精神病替代概念的框架的实用性提供了支持。
The Triarchic Model of psychopathy was formulated as an integrative framework for reconciling differing conceptions of psychopathy. The model characterizes psychopathy in terms of three distinguishable phenotypic components: boldness, meanness, and disinhibition. Data from a large mixed-gender undergraduate sample (N = 618) were used to examine relations of several of the best-known measures for assessing psychopathic traits with scores on the Triarchic Psychopathy Measure (TriPM), an inventory developed to operationalize the Triarchic Model through separate facet scales. Analyses revealed that established inventories of psychopathy index components of the model as indexed by the TriPM to varying degrees. While each inventory provided effective coverage of meanness and disinhibition components, instruments differed in their representation of boldness. Current results demonstrate the heuristic value of the Triarchic Model for delineating commonalities and differences among alternative measures of psychopathy, and provide support for the utility of the Triarchic Model as a framework for reconciling alternative conceptions of psychopathy.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
3.6
作者：
Blonigen, Daniel M.;Patrick, Christopher J.;Douglas, Kevin S.;Poythress, Norman G.;Skeem, Jennifer L.;Lilienfeld, Scott O.;Edens, John F.;Krueger, Robert F.
通讯作者：
Krueger, Robert F.
影响因子：
3.8
作者：
Hall, JR;Benning, SD;Patrick, CJ
通讯作者：
Patrick, CJ
影响因子：
4.6
作者：
Hicks, Brian M.;Patrick, Christopher J.
通讯作者：
Patrick, Christopher J.
影响因子：
6.9
作者：
Kramer, M. D.;Patrick, C. J.;Gasperi, M.
通讯作者：
Gasperi, M.
影响因子：
22.4
作者：
CAMPBELL, DT;FISKE, DW
通讯作者：
FISKE, DW