Making the rich richer: Frontoparietal tDCS enhances transfer effects of a single-session distractor inhibition training on working memory in high capacity individuals but reduces them in low capacity individuals
Making the rich richer: Frontoparietal tDCS enhances transfer effects of a single-session distractor inhibition training on working memory in high capacity individuals but reduces them in low capacity individuals
复制标题
让富人更富:额顶 tDCS 增强了单次分心抑制训练对高能力个体工作记忆的转移效应,但降低了低能力个体的转移效应
DOI:
10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118438
复制
发表时间:
2021
期刊:
影响因子:
5.7
通讯作者:
Müller NG
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Schmicker M;Menze I;Schneider C;Taubert M;Zaehle T;Müller NG
Working memory (WM) performance depends on the ability to extract relevant while inhibiting irrelevant information from entering the WM storage. This distractor inhibition ability can be trained and is known to induce transfer effects on WM performance. Here we asked whether transfer on WM can be boosted by transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) during a single-session distractor inhibition training. As WM performance is ascribed to the frontoparietal network, in which prefrontal areas are associated with inhibiting distractors and posterior parietal areas with storing information, we placed the anode over the prefrontal and the cathode over the posterior parietal cortex during a single-session distractor inhibition training. This network-oriented stimulation protocol should enhance inhibition processes by shifting the neural activity from posterior to prefrontal regions. WM improved after a single-session distractor inhibition training under verum stimulation but only in subjects with a high WM capacity. In subjects with a low WM capacity, verum tDCS reduced the transfer effects on WM. We assume tDCS to strengthen the frontostriatal pathway in individuals with a high WM capacity leading to efficient inhibition of distractors. In contrast, the cathodal stimulation of the posterior parietal cortex might have hindered usual compensational mechanism in low capacity subjects, i.e. maintaining also irrelevant information in memory. Our results thus stress the need to adjust tDCS protocols to well-founded knowledge about neural networks and individual cognitive differences.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
3.2
作者:
M. Schmicker;Melanie Schwefel;A. Vellage;N. Müller
通讯作者:
M. Schmicker;Melanie Schwefel;A. Vellage;N. Müller
影响因子:
3.2
作者:
Au, Jacky;Katz, Benjamin;Jonides, John
通讯作者:
Jonides, John
影响因子:
1.7
作者:
Ohn, Suk Hoon;Park, Chang-II;Kim, Yun-Hee
通讯作者:
Kim, Yun-Hee
影响因子:
2.9
作者:
Habich A;Klöppel S;Abdulkadir A;Scheller E;Nissen C;Peter J
通讯作者:
Peter J
影响因子:
3.7
作者:
Molenberghs, Pascal;Mesulam, Marsel M.;Vandenberghe, Rik R. C.
通讯作者:
Vandenberghe, Rik R. C.