Interactive effects of cumulative stress and impulsivity on alcohol consumption.
Interactive effects of cumulative stress and impulsivity on alcohol consumption.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1111/j.1530-0277.2010.01221.x
复制
发表时间：
2010-08
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Rajita S
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Fox HC;Bergquist KL;Peihua G;Rajita S
酒精成瘾可能反映了对压力、奖励和调节大脑系统的适应。虽然大量研究已确定压力和冲动都是饮酒的独立危险因素，但很少有研究在社区定期饮酒者样本中评估危险饮酒方面压力和冲动之间的相互作用关系。使用酒精使用障碍识别测试 (AUDIT) 对当地社区的 130 名经常饮酒者 (56M/74F) 进行了危险和有害的饮酒模式评估。所有参与者还接受了巴勒特冲动量表（BIS-11）作为特质冲动的衡量标准，并使用累积压力/逆境检查表（CSC）作为累积不良生活事件的综合衡量标准。使用标准多元回归模型来确定总体压力和冲动的独立性和交互性，以及危险和有害饮酒的特定类型的压力和冲动。最近的生活压力、累积的创伤压力、整体冲动、非计划相关的冲动以及认知和运动相关的冲动都是 AUDIT 分数的独立预测因素。然而，累积压力和总冲动分数之间的相互作用造成了很大的方差，表明大量到中等数量的不良事件和高特质冲动评级相互作用，影响更大的审计分数。在压力和冲动分量表中，累积生活创伤分量表对 AUDIT 分数的差异影响最大。研究结果强调了危险饮酒方面压力和冲动之间的相互作用关系。还讨论了累积创伤应激作为饮酒问题标志的特殊重要性。
Alcohol addiction may reflect adaptations to stress, reward, and regulatory brain systems. While extensive research has identified both stress and impulsivity as independent risk factors for drinking, few studies have assessed the interactive relationship between stress and impulsivity in terms of hazardous drinking within a community sample of regular drinkers. One hundred and thirty regular drinkers (56M/74F) from the local community were assessed for hazardous and harmful patterns of alcohol consumption using the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT). All participants were also administered the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale (BIS-11) as a measure of trait impulsivity and the Cumulative Stress/Adversity Checklist (CSC) as a comprehensive measure of cumulative adverse life events. Standard multiple regression models were used to ascertain the independent and interactive nature of both overall stress and impulsivity as well as specific types of stress and impulsivity on hazardous and harmful drinking. Recent life stress, cumulative traumatic stress, overall impulsivity, and nonplanning-related impulsivity as well as cognitive and motor-related impulsivity were all independently predictive of AUDIT scores. However, the interaction between cumulative stress and total impulsivity scores accounted for a significant amount of the variance, indicating that a high to moderate number of adverse events and a high trait impulsivity rating interacted to affect greater AUDIT scores. The subscale of cumulative life trauma accounted for the most variance in AUDIT scores among the stress and impulsivity subscales. Findings highlight the interactive relationship between stress and impulsivity with regard to hazardous drinking. The specific importance of cumulative traumatic stress as a marker for problem drinking is also discussed.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
2.4
作者：
Chambers, R Andrew;Potenza, Marc N
通讯作者：
Potenza, Marc N
影响因子：
10.6
作者：
Covault, Jonathan;Tennen, Howard;Kranzler, Henry R.
通讯作者：
Kranzler, Henry R.
DOI：
10.1007/s00406-004-0488-z
发表时间：
2004-08-01
影响因子：
4.7
作者：
Asahi, S;Okamoto, Y;Yokota, N
通讯作者：
Yokota, N
影响因子：
5.9
作者：
BRANTLEY, PJ;MCKNIGHT, GT;TULLEY, R
通讯作者：
TULLEY, R
影响因子：
4.3
作者：
de Wit, Harriet;Flory, Janine D.;Manuck, Stephen B.
通讯作者：
Manuck, Stephen B.