Potential Clinical Value of Biomarker-Guided Emergency Triage for Thoracic Aortic Dissection.
Potential Clinical Value of Biomarker-Guided Emergency Triage for Thoracic Aortic Dissection.
复制标题
生物标志物引导的胸主动脉夹层急诊分诊的潜在临床价值
DOI:
10.3389/fcvm.2021.777327
复制
发表时间:
2021
影响因子:
3.6
通讯作者:
Lu X
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Qiu P;Yang M;Pu H;Hou J;Chen X;Wu Z;Huang Q;Huang S;Fu Y;Wen Z;Zhang C;Zha B;Yang Y;Xu Z;Chen F;Lu X
Aim: Thoracic aortic dissection (TAD) is a high-risk vascular disease. The mortality rate of untreated TADs in 24 h was as high as 50%. Thus, rapid diagnosis of TAD in the emergency department would get patients to the right treatments to save their lives. Methods: We profiled the proteome of aortic tissues from TAD patients using a label-free quantification proteomics method. The differentially expressed proteins were screened and subjected to bioinformatics analysis. Candidate biomarkers were selected and validated in independent serum samples using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs). The diagnostic values were further predicted via receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Results: A total of 1,141 differentially expressed proteins were identified in aortic tissues from 17 TAD patients and eight myocardial infarction (MI) patients. Six proteins were selected as candidate biomarkers for ELISAs in an independent training set of 20 serum samples (TAD = 10, MI = 10). Of these proteins, four with a P-value < 0.01 were further validated in another independent set of 64 serum samples (TAD = 32, MI = 32) via ELISAs. ITGA2, COL2A1, and MIF had P-values < 0.0001, and their areas under the curve (AUCs) were 0.801 (95% CI: 0.691–0.911), 0.773 (95% CI: 0.660–0.887), and 0.701 (95% CI: 0.574–0.828), respectively. Conclusion: ITGA2, COL2A1, and MIF were identified as promising biomarkers for discriminating TAD from emergency patients with severe chest pain. Biomarker-guided emergency triage could further shorten the time for patients to get more effective treatments.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
64.8
作者:
Kim, Min-Sik;Pinto, Sneha M.;Getnet, Derese;Nirujogi, Raja Sekhar;Manda, Srikanth S.;Chaerkady, Raghothama;Madugundu, Anil K.;Kelkar, Dhanashree S.;Isserlin, Ruth;Jain, Shobhit;Thomas, Joji K.;Muthusamy, Babylakshmi;Leal-Rojas, Pamela;Kumar, Praveen;Sahasrabuddhe, Nandini A.;Balakrishnan, Lavanya;Advani, Jayshree;George, Bijesh;Renuse, Santosh;Selvan, Lakshmi Dhevi N.;Patil, Arun H.;Nanjappa, Vishalakshi;Radhakrishnan, Aneesha;Prasad, Samarjeet;Subbannayya, Tejaswini;Raju, Rajesh;Kumar, Manish;Sreenivasamurthy, Sreelakshmi K.;Marimuthu, Arivusudar;Sathe, Gajanan J.;Chavan, Sandip;Datta, Keshava K.;Subbannayya, Yashwanth;Sahu, Apeksha;Yelamanchi, Soujanya D.;Jayaram, Savita;Rajagopalan, Pavithra;Sharma, Jyoti;Murthy, Krishna R.;Syed, Nazia;Goel, Renu;Khan, Aafaque A.;Ahmad, Sartaj;Dey, Gourav;Mudgal, Keshav;Chatterjee, Aditi;Huang, Tai-Chung;Zhong, Jun;Wu, Xinyan;Shaw, Patrick G.;Freed, Donald;Zahari, Muhammad S.;Mukherjee, Kanchan K.;Shankar, Subramanian;Mahadevan, Anita;Lam, Henry;Mitchell, Christopher J.;Shankar, Susarla Krishna;Satishchandra, Parthasarathy;Schroeder, John T.;Sirdeshmukh, Ravi;Maitra, Anirban;Leach, Steven D.;Drake, Charles G.;Halushka, Marc K.;Prasad, T. S. Keshava;Hruban, Ralph H.;Kerr, Candace L.;Bader, Gary D.;Iacobuzio-Donahue, Christine A.;Gowda, Harsha;Pandey, Akhilesh
通讯作者:
Pandey, Akhilesh
影响因子:
7.8
作者:
Carragher, N O;Levkau, B;Ross, R;Raines, E W
通讯作者:
Raines, E W
影响因子:
14.9
作者:
The Gene Ontology Consortium
通讯作者:
The Gene Ontology Consortium
影响因子:
14.9
作者:
Kanehisa M;Araki M;Goto S;Hattori M;Hirakawa M;Itoh M;Katayama T;Kawashima S;Okuda S;Tokimatsu T;Yamanishi Y
通讯作者:
Yamanishi Y
影响因子:
3.3
作者:
Borges, Luciano de Figueiredo;Jaldin, Rodrigo Gibin;Gutierrez, Paulo Sampaio
通讯作者:
Gutierrez, Paulo Sampaio