A labor/leisure tradeoff in cognitive control.
A labor/leisure tradeoff in cognitive control.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1037/a0031048
复制
发表时间：
2014-02
影响因子：
4.1
通讯作者：
Botvinick, Matthew
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Kool, Wouter;Botvinick, Matthew
日常生活经常提供两种选择，一种是有利可图但对精神要求很高的活动(认知劳动)，另一种是要求不高但也没有生产力的活动(认知休闲)。尽管这样的决定通常是含蓄的，但它们有助于决定学习成绩、职业发展轨迹，甚至健康结果。之前的研究已经阐明了最终定义认知劳动的执行控制功能，以及伴随认知休闲的大脑功能的默认模式。然而，关于劳动/休闲决策实际上是如何做出的，人们知之甚少。在这里，我们确定了指导这些决定的核心原则。三个经济选择实验的结果表明，认知劳动/休闲决策的动机是在收入和休闲之间取得最佳平衡，这是由联合效用函数给出的。所报道的结果在微观经济学和执行功能研究之间建立了新的联系。他们还对所谓的自我耗竭效应提出了一种新的解释，并提出了一种潜在的新方法来处理走神和自我控制失败等现象。
Daily life frequently offers a choice between activities that are profitable but mentally demanding (cognitive labor) and activities that are undemanding but also unproductive (cognitive leisure). Although such decisions are often implicit, they help determine academic performance, career trajectories, and even health outcomes. Previous research has shed light both on the executive control functions that ultimately define cognitive labor and a ‘default mode’ of brain function that accompanies cognitive leisure. However, little is known about how labor/leisure decisions are actually made. Here, we identify a central principle guiding such decisions. Results from three economic-choice experiments indicate that the motivation underlying cognitive labor/leisure decision-making is to strike an optimal balance between income and leisure, as given by a joint utility function. The results reported establish a new connection between microeconomics and research on executive function. They also suggest a new interpretation of so-called ego-depletion effects, and a potential new approach to such phenomena as mind-wandering and self-control failure.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
1.3
作者：
BIGELOW, G;LIEBSON, I
通讯作者：
LIEBSON, I
DOI：
10.1098/rstb.2007.2098
发表时间：
2007-05-29
影响因子：
6.3
作者：
Cohen, Jonathan D.;McClure, Samuel M.;Yu, Angela J.
通讯作者：
Yu, Angela J.
DOI：
10.1111/j.1467-8721.2007.00534.x
发表时间：
2007-12-01
影响因子：
7.2
作者：
Baumeister, Roy F.;Vohs, Kathleen D.;Tice, Dianne M.
通讯作者：
Tice, Dianne M.
影响因子：
22.4
作者：
Hagger, Martin S.;Wood, Chantelle;Chatzisarantis, Nikos L. D.
通讯作者：
Chatzisarantis, Nikos L. D.
DOI：
10.1037/h0027670
发表时间：
1969-01-01
期刊：
JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE AND PHYSIOLOGICAL PSYCHOLOGY
影响因子：
--
作者：
COLLIER, G;JENNINGS, W
通讯作者：
JENNINGS, W