Bidirectional effects of parenting and child behavior in internationally adopting families.
Bidirectional effects of parenting and child behavior in internationally adopting families.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1037/fam0000309
复制
发表时间：
2017-08
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Gunnar MR
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Lawler JM;Koss KJ;Gunnar MR
收养标志着一个激进的过渡，在收养数以千计的儿童从国际机构照顾，但是，很少有人知道这种养育的质量相比，其他人口或在过渡到家庭照顾的收养后的家庭的父母和孩子的特点的交易效果。目前的研究调查了68名国际收养儿童的父母敏感性/反应性和结构/限制设置（41名女孩，27名男孩; M年龄= 26.13个月，SD=4.99）和他们的父母在收养后的第一年，并将他们与非收养家庭的样本进行比较。（26名女孩，26名男孩; M年龄= 27.65个月，SD=5.71）。结果表明，没有平均水平的差异，在养育质量的任一维度之间的养父母和非养父母。对于后机构化的青年，更高质量的父母结构和限制设置后不久，通过预测减少儿童监管的困难，8个月后，但是，最初的儿童监管没有预测以后的养育。父母的敏感性/反应性没有交叉滞后关系。更高质量的收养前照顾儿童与更高的分数的敏感性/反应性和结构和限制设置之间的养父母。较少的生长发育迟缓，表明较少的收养前逆境，与父母使用更有效的结构和限制设置行为。政策应促进国外更好的收养前护理，如降低父母与子女的比率，以及尽早收养。至少在一般表现出高敏感性/反应性的家庭，干预措施应针对父母的结构和限制设置有最大的影响，在收养后的几年内对儿童的行为调节。
Adoption marks a radical transition in caregiving for thousands of children adopted internationally from institutional care; however, very little is known about the quality of this parenting compared to other populations or the transactional effects of parent and child characteristics in post-adoption families during the transition to family care. The current study examined parental sensitivity/responsiveness and structure/limit-setting in a group of 68 children adopted internationally from institutions (41 girls, 27 boys; M age = 26.13 months, SD=4.99) and their parents over the first year following adoption and compared them to a sample of non-adoptive families (26 girls, 26 boys; M age = 27.65 months, SD=5.71). Results indicated no mean-level differences in parenting quality on either dimension between adoptive and non-adoptive parents. For post-institutionalized youth, higher quality parental structure and limit-setting soon after adoption predicted reduced child regulation difficulties eight months later; however, initial child regulation did not predict later parenting. There were no cross-lagged relations for parental sensitivity/responsiveness. Higher quality preadoptive care for children was associated with higher scores on both sensitivity/responsiveness and structure and limit-setting among adoptive parents. Less growth stunting, indicative of less preadoptive adversity, was associated with parents’ use of more effective structure and limit-setting behaviors. Policies should promote better preadoptive care abroad, such as lower caregiver-child ratios, as well as early adoption. At least in families exhibiting generally high sensitivity/responsiveness, interventions should target parental structure and limit-setting to have the greatest effect on child behavioral regulation in the immediate years post-adoption.
登录
查看更多内容
DOI：
10.1007/s10560-009-0165-1
发表时间：
2009-08
期刊：
Child & adolescent social work journal : C & A
影响因子：
--
作者：
Dozier M;Lindhiem O;Lewis E;Bick J;Bernard K;Peloso E
通讯作者：
Peloso E
影响因子：
1.9
作者：
Fisher, PA;Chamberlain, P
通讯作者：
Chamberlain, P
DOI：
10.1196/annals.1376.023
发表时间：
2006-01-01
期刊：
RESILIENCE IN CHILDREN
影响因子：
--
作者：
Fisher, Philip A.;Gunnar, Megan R.;Pears, Katherine C.
通讯作者：
Pears, Katherine C.
DOI：
10.1073/pnas.1121246109
发表时间：
2012-10-16
影响因子：
11.1
作者：
Hostinar, Camelia E.;Stellern, Sarah A.;Gunnar, Megan R.
通讯作者：
Gunnar, Megan R.
影响因子：
4.6
作者：
Chisholm, K
通讯作者：
Chisholm, K