For they know not what they do? Target memory and metacognitive monitoring of self-disclosures on social networking sites
For they know not what they do? Target memory and metacognitive monitoring of self-disclosures on social networking sites
复制标题
因为他们不知道自己在做什么？
DOI：
10.1016/j.chb.2016.06.008
复制
发表时间：
2016
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Pieschl
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Pieschl
为了充分权衡在社交网站(SNS)上自我披露的风险和好处，用户了解其数字隐私的当前状况是至关重要的。在这种背景下，认知和元认知因素似乎是必要的，例如，关于谁确切地接触到哪些信息的目标记忆，以及对自己目标记忆状态的元认知监控。本研究从基本记忆和元认知的研究范式出发，系统考察了风险线索对这些变量的影响：在实验一中，98名年轻社交网络用户反复向大小受众(被试内部：受众规模)披露个人或非个人信息(被试之间：信息亲密度)。之后，他们对目标记忆进行了评估，并对每个答案进行了元认知信心判断。结果表明，如果参与者透露了一些信息，但在目标记忆方面存在困难(纠正了内容与特定受众之间的关联)，那么他们会记得很好，这一影响反映在元认知监控方面。重要的是，参与者的目标记忆在风险条件下(个人信息、大量观众)显著更好，但他们没有元认知意识到这些风险影响。实验2(N=1059)复制了观众规模效应，并证实这些不是视觉显著的伪像。
To adequately weigh the risks and benefits of self-disclosures on Social Networking Sites (SNS), it is pivotal for users to be aware of the current status of their digital privacy. Cognitive and metacognitive factors seem necessary in this context, for exampletarget memoryabout who exactly has access to exactly which pieces of information andmetacognitive monitoringof the status of one’s own target memory. Transferring paradigms from basic memory and metacognition research, we systematically investigated the impact ofrisk cueson these variables: In Experiment 1 ninety-eight young SNS users repeatedly disclosed personal or impersonal information (between-subject: information intimacy) to large or small audiences (within-subject: audience size). Afterwards their target memory was assessed and they gave metacognitive confidence judgments regarding each answer. Results indicate that participants remembered well if they had disclosed something but struggled with target memory (correctassociation between content and specific audience), an effect that was mirrored regarding metacognitive monitoring. Importantly participants’ target memory was significantly better under conditions ofrisk(personal information, large audience), but they were not metacognitively aware of these risk effects. Experiment 2 (N= 59) replicated the audience size effects and confirmed that these were not artifacts of visual salience.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
3.4
作者：
Atsunobu Suzuki;Sayaka Suga
通讯作者：
Atsunobu Suzuki;Sayaka Suga
影响因子：
2.4
作者：
Alan S. Brown;Susan L. Hornstein;A. Memon
通讯作者：
A. Memon
受众可视化影响在线社交网络中的信息披露
DOI：
--
发表时间：
2011
期刊：
CHI Extended Abstracts
影响因子：
--
作者：
Kelly E. Caine;Lorraine G. Kisselburgh;Louise Lareau
通讯作者：
Louise Lareau
虚假的名声、感知的清晰度还是说服力？
影响因子：
4.8
作者：
Max Weisbuch;D. Mackie
通讯作者：
D. Mackie
元认知中的线索熟悉启发法。
DOI：
10.1037//0278-7393.19.4.851
发表时间：
1993
期刊：
Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition
影响因子：
--
作者：
Metcalfe,J;Schwartz,BL;Joaquim,SG
通讯作者：
Joaquim,SG