Troubled past: A critical psychometric assessment of the self-report Survey of Autobiographical Memory (SAM).
Troubled past: A critical psychometric assessment of the self-report Survey of Autobiographical Memory (SAM).
复制标题
DOI：
10.3758/s13428-021-01604-7
复制
发表时间：
2022-03
影响因子：
5.4
通讯作者：
Spreng RN
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Setton R;Lockrow AW;Turner GR;Spreng RN
自传体记忆调查（SAM）是一个易于管理的测量自我感知自传体记忆（AM）回忆能力。我们提供了一个全面的心理测量评估的SAM在年轻人和老年人。首先，我们评估了SAM的可靠性作为衡量自我感知的回忆能力。接下来，我们测试了SAM是否是一个有效的措施，情节和自传体记忆的表现，广泛使用的性能为基础的措施进行评估。最后，我们调查了SAM，认知措施和自我报告的心理功能评估之间的关联。SAM表现出的可靠性，作为一个自我报告的措施，感知回忆能力。除SAM语义外，各分量表之间观察到高度的内部一致性。证据之间的分量表的独立性是混合的：SAM-情节和SAM-语义项目表现出各自的分量表对应不良。良好的对应关系，观察未来和空间项目和SAM分量表之间。SAM与自传体访谈（AI）测量的AM表现的关联有限，但与自我报告的AI事件生动性广泛相关。SAM分数与基于表现的记忆测量弱相关，并且是年龄不变的，与已知的年龄对陈述性记忆的影响不一致。收敛的证据表明，SAM情节和SAM语义分量表是不独立的，不应该被解释为情节或语义记忆的具体措施。SAM与自我效能显著相关，表明与领域一般自我报告能力的信心相关。我们敦促谨慎使用和解释SAM作为AM的衡量标准，等待修订和进一步的心理测量验证。
The Survey of Autobiographical Memory (SAM) was designed as an easy-to-administer measure of self-perceived autobiographical memory (AM) recollection capacity. We provide a comprehensive psychometric evaluation of the SAM in younger and older adults. First, we evaluated the reliability of the SAM as a measure of self-perceived recollective capacity. Next, we tested whether the SAM was a valid measure of episodic and autobiographical memory performance, as assessed with widely used performance-based measures. Finally, we investigated associations between the SAM, cognitive measures and self-reported assessments of psychological functioning. The SAM demonstrated reliability as a self-report measure of perceived recollective capacity. High internal consistency was observed across subscales, with the exception of SAM-semantic. Evidence for independence among the subscales was mixed: SAM-episodic and SAM-semantic items showed poor correspondence with respective subscales. Good correspondence was observed between the future and spatial items and their SAM subscales. The SAM showed limited associations with AM performance as measured by the Autobiographical Interview (AI), yet were broadly associated with self-reported AI event vividness. SAM scores were weakly associated with performance-based memory measures and were age-invariant, inconsistent with known age effects on declarative memory. Converging evidence indicated that SAM-episodic and SAM-semantic subscales are not independent and should not be interpreted as specific measures of episodic or semantic memory. The SAM was robustly associated with self-efficacy, suggesting an association with confidence in domain general self-report abilities. We urge caution in the use and interpretation of the SAM as a measure of AM, pending revision and further psychometric validation.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
3.8
作者：
D'Angiulli A;Runge M;Faulkner A;Zakizadeh J;Chan A;Morcos S
通讯作者：
Morcos S
影响因子：
22.4
作者：
Asperholm, Martin;Hogman, Nadja;Herlitz, Agneta
通讯作者：
Herlitz, Agneta
影响因子：
4
作者：
BANDURA, A
通讯作者：
BANDURA, A
影响因子：
4.2
作者：
BARNES, CA
通讯作者：
BARNES, CA
影响因子：
1.8
作者：
Bouazzaoui, Badiaa;Isingrini, Michel;Taconnat, Laurence
通讯作者：
Taconnat, Laurence