Updating constructions: additive effects of prior and current experience during sentence production.
Updating constructions: additive effects of prior and current experience during sentence production.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1515/cog-2022-0020
复制
发表时间：
2023-08
影响因子：
1.7
通讯作者：
Levshina, Natalia
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Thothathiri, Malathi;Levshina, Natalia
虽然更早的工作表明，以前的动词偏见从终身的语言经验影响语言处理，最近的研究结果强调了一个事实，即动词偏见在实验室为基础的曝光会议也影响处理。我们研究了更新的性质，即， 先前和当前的经验在指导随后的句子生成方面如何相互作用。参与者接受了一个简短的培训课程，我们操纵已知的英语与格动词的偏见。使用语料库估计每个动词的双宾语（DO）与介词宾语（PO）与格的先验偏差。目前的动词偏见抵消和控制实验。贝叶斯混合效应逻辑模型的参与者的反应（DO或PO）在随后的自由选择生产表明，无论是以前和现在的动词偏见影响扬声器的建设选择。这些影响是加性的，而不是相互作用的，与基于错误的学习模型的预测相反。与其他动词的语义相似性及其实验操纵的偏见影响句子的产生，与基于项目的类比和范例理论相一致。这些结果揭示了潜在的机制，语言更新和适应的句子生产正在进行的经验。
While much earlier work has indicated that prior verb bias from lifelong language experience influences language processing, recent findings highlight the fact that verb biases induced during lab-based exposure sessions also influence processing. We investigated the nature of updating, i.e., how prior and current experience might interact in guiding subsequent sentence production. Participants underwent a short training session where we manipulated the bias of known English dative verbs. The prior bias of each verb for the double-object (DO) versus the prepositional-object (PO) dative was estimated using a corpus. Current verb bias was counterbalanced and controlled experimentally. Bayesian mixed-effects logistic models of participants’ responses (DO or PO) during subsequent free-choice production showed that both the prior and current verb biases affected speakers’ construction choice. These effects were additive and not interactive, contrary to the prediction from error-based learning models. Semantic similarity to other verbs and their experimentally manipulated biases influenced sentence production, consistent with item-based analogy and exemplar theory. These results shed light on the potential mechanisms underlying language updating and the adaptation of sentence production to ongoing experience.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
5.4
作者：
Chang, F;Dell, GS;Bock, K
通讯作者：
Bock, K
影响因子：
2.1
作者：
Bybee, Joan
通讯作者：
Bybee, Joan
影响因子：
3.4
作者：
Jaeger TF;Snider NE
通讯作者：
Snider NE
影响因子：
3.6
作者：
Duncan, Dock;Theeuwes, Jan
通讯作者：
Theeuwes, Jan
影响因子：
3
作者：
Christiansen, Morten H.
通讯作者：
Christiansen, Morten H.